Electromet apology to Jeffriesc@epa au

[NiagaraNet@AOL.COM]

Subj:   RE: Niagara Falls Electromet    

Date:   6/3/2003 9:29:50 PM Eastern Standard Time   

From:   jeffriesc@epa.nsw.gov.au    

To: NiagaraNet@aol.com  

Sent from the Internet (Details)    

    

Ohh I'm sorry. You specifically talked about the Electromet plant in your posting. Now it seems you want to talk about a complex. The quote that you introduced to support your arguement shows that Electromet did not process U ore but a chemical compound of U. And in fact it seems, from below, that you are now saying it was the complex and not in fact the individual electromet plant that processed the ore to metal. It would be good if you more clearly verbalised of your thoughts.

 

And let me reiterate one point. The "shameful" reference from the DOE was in fact quoted by you not me. You introduced it and claimed that it proved your point. I merely explored the inconsistencies of YOUR reference.

 

BTW until you are aware of what knowledge I have DO NOT question my knowledge. You might just find I know a bit more about the U fuel cycle than you do, my friend.

 

And don't start this crap about jeffriesc; MR NigaraNet, did your parents really call you NigaraNet? This just highlights your ignorance of IT and electronic communications.


> -----Original Message



Subj:   Electromet apology to jeffries@epa au   

Date:   6/3/2003 10:44:48 PM Eastern Standard Time  

From:   NiagaraNet  

To: jeffriesc@epa.nsw.gov.au, radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu   

CC: NiagaraNet  

    



In a message dated 6/3/2003 9:29:50 PM Eastern Standard Time, jeffriesc@epa.nsw.gov.au writes:

> jeffriesc  (Would Jeffriesc be Jeffrie as a first or last name? )



Dear Sir or Madam (?): 


I am terribly sorry that you have taken any offense. Please accept my sincerest regret for any distress that I may have caused you. Since you did not sign your post or email with a name, I only used your email address to be polite. I am also sorry that I caused you to curse me over this.


I too, was only using exploratory language, statements and questions to you for the purpose of discovery and discourse. With regard to the Electromet reference from the DOE URL, please feel free to research the site (factory, complex, laboratories) for yourself. I was only offering the information I thought might be of interest and importance to the RADSAFE community with regard to legacy locations, potential hazards, etc.


I only offered the information about early fuel cycle work at Niagara's Electromet with the presumption that you wouldn't know about that location specifically. I am sorry if you do have specific knowledge and I was wrong in my assumption. I will, however, by your leave, allow the fact that you may very well know more about all subjects than I. 


I presumed no knowledge of yours to cause offense. I was trying to address any and all readers regardless of their level of knowledge. Once again, please accept my apology.


I am sorry that you think of my Internet communications as ignorant. I will attempt to improve my skills. I thank you for this critique.


If you would accept a fruit and cheese plate, or perhaps a floral arrangement as a token of my regret, please feel free to tell me where I may send it.


Sincerely,

L.H. Ricciuti

NiagaraNet@aol.com


* (If you knew my Mom and Dad, God rest their souls, you might not think that they wouldn't have named me NiagaraNet :*) Cheer and best regards.