RadSafe Archive Mail Index June, 2003

• Thread Index
• [RadSafe Home]
• [RadSafe Archives Search & Browse]

Listing format is the following:

• Subject (# of follow-ups) From
  

• " 7th crew member dies of boiler-blast i (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• AW: " 7th crew member dies of boiler-bla (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Dr.Gofman--I just wonder.. (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: MSNBC News Item - Uranium hunter fol (0) John Jacobus
  
• Citation Correction re: Gofman (0) James Barnes
  
• NPRI Scientific Symposium: Scientific? O (0) BobCherry
  
• USDA to offer irradiated beef to schoolk (0) Stewart Farber
  
• Niagara Falls citation--Hunger, Knowledg (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Niagara Falls citation--Hunger, Know (1) BLHamrick
  
• Gofman (0) Read, Jacques
  
• Off-topic but may be of general interest (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Niagara Falls citation--Hunger, Know (0) John Jacobus
  
• person-rem cost benefit analysis....??? (0) Dave Brown
  
• Re: Peanut butter or other skin decon me (0) Pmink
  
• Who Was MED's Largest Ore-to-Metal Produ (0) Janet Westbrook
  
• Niagara Falls Electromet (1) NiagaraNet
  
• Niagara Falls citation--Hunger, Knowledg (1) Steven Dapra
  
• NPRI Scientific Symposium: Scientific? O (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Niagara Falls citation--Hunger, Know (0) maury
  
• Manhattan Project Legacy (1) Read, Jacques
  
• nuclear medicine misadministration (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Manhattan Project Legacy (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Niagara Falls Electromet (0) Janet Westbrook
  
• Re: Niagara Falls Electromet (1) NiagaraNet
  
• RE: Niagara Falls Electromet (0) Janet Westbrook
  
• RE: Niagara Falls Electromet (0) Abelquist, Eric
  
• Irradiated Beef at Dairy Queen (1) Nielsen, Erik
  
• Re: Irradiated Beef at Dairy Queen (0) Stewart Farber
  
• Y-12 uranium releases judged no health t (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• U.S. will join suit against Paducah plan (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Training (0) Mercado, Don
  
• RE: Niagara Falls Electromet (0) Jeffries Cameron
  
• Re: Niagara Falls Electromet (0) NiagaraNet
  
• X-Ray film Repeat Analysis (0) Timothy C. Coe
  
• Electromet apology to jeffries@epa au (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Electromet apology to Jeffriesc@epa au (0) NiagaraNet
  
• shielding_CT scanner (0) thskouras
  
• Steve, Jacques (0) NiagaraNet
  
• George's Gems (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• No Subject (0) Frank Scarano II
  
• RE: shielding_CT scanner (1) Parry, Don (CIS)
  
• cellular mutation and cancer - or lack t (1) Zack Clayton
  
• Re: cellular mutation and cancer - or la (0) John Jacobus
  
• Fwd: Manhattan Project Legacy (1) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Manhattan Project Legacy (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Washington State Radiation Health Fact S (0) Strom, Daniel J
  
• RE: Manhattan Project Legacy (0) John Jacobus
  
• Last Comment Re Electro Met Production (0) Janet Westbrook
  
• Re: Last Comment Re Electro Met Producti (1) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Only Comment Re Electro Met Producti (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Last Comment Re Electro Met Producti (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Dr.Gofman--I just wonder.. (1) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Only Comment Re Electro Met Producti (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Dr.Gofman--I just wonder.. (1) Vincent King
  
• Re: Help ! I'm confused (was Last Commen (1) JGinniver
  
• Re: Fwd: Manhattan Project Legacy (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Dr.Gofman--I just wonder.. (0) Cary Renquist
  
• RE: Niagara Falls Electromet (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Mossman paper in Health Physics News (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Dr.Gofman--I just wonder.. (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: shielding_CT scanner (0) Gary Isenhower
  
• Port Hope (formerly Niagara Falls Electr (0) Monica Oosting
  
• Entry level health physicist position in (0) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Last Comment Re Electro Met Producti (0) Fred_Haywood
  
• Re: Help ! I'm confused (was Last Commen (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: Dr.Gofman--I just wonder.. (0) Shackford, Hobart W
  
• Background radiation, Geiger counters, a (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• HP Tech Position in St. Louis (0) Dan Hoffman
  
• Re: Mossman paper in Health Physics News (2) epirad
  
• Re: Mossman paper in Health Physics News (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Background radiation, Geiger counter (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Background radiation, Geiger counter (0) Vincent King
  
• Re: Background radiation, Geiger counter (1) BLHamrick
  
• SNM Inventory Question (0) donald_flahardy
  
• Re: Mossman paper in Health Physics News (0) Gary Isenhower
  
• My reward offers (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Mossman paper in Health Physics News (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Niagara Falls Electromet (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: Niagara Falls Electromet (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: Niagara Falls Electromet (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Field Detection of Tc-99 during remediat (0) Anagnostopoulos, Harry W.
  
• Re: Background radiation, Geiger counter (0) Vincent King
  
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 6 (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Mossman paper in Health Physics News (0) epirad
  
• Watching for radiation - Detectors at la (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• COHEN FIELD DEBATE (1) Gary Howard
  
• Re: Brazil Nut Radwaste Standard (2) Jerry Cohen
  
• Cardio disease citation--as promised, wa (1) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: COHEN FIELD DEBATE (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Cardio disease citation--as promised (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Brazil Nut Radwaste Standard (1) Joan Stovall
  
• RE: Niagara Falls Electromet (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Cardio disease citation--as promised, wa (1) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Brazil Nut Radwaste Standard (1) Stewart Farber
  
• Re: Cardio disease citation--as promised (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• The Bomb That Fell--was Gofman (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Brazil Nut Radwaste Standard (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Nanoscale particles (0) nanoamor
  
• Niagara Net (0) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: COHEN FIELD DEBATE (0) epirad
  
• Re: COHEN FIELD DEBATE (0) epirad
  
• Re: Niagara Falls Electromet (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Brazil Nut Radwaste Standard (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Manhattan Project Legacy (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Brazil Nut Radwaste Standard (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: medical misadministration to child (0) Carol Marcus
  
• Cardio, Niagara ET AL-- (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Manhattan Project Legacy (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: The Bomb That Fell--was Gofman (1) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: The Bomb That Fell--was Gofman (2) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Replying to the list, Agent Orange, (was (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: Brazil Nut Radwaste Standard (2) George Sallit
  
• Steel industry news and information from (0) marketing@steelonthenet.com
  
• Re: Cardio disease citation--as promised (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Manhattan Project Legacy (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Cardio disease citation--as promised (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Replying to the list, Agent Orange, (1) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Brazil Nut Radwaste Standard (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: Ltr to WashPost (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• The Bomb That Fell--Re:Cs reference (1) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: The Bomb That Fell--Re:Cs reference (0) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: Cardio disease citation--as promised (1) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Cardio disease citation--as promised (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Brazil Nut Radwaste Standard (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Manhattan Project Legacy (1) William V Lipton
  
• George's Gems (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Looking for R&TH (0) Sinton, David
  
• Re: Cardio disease citation--as promised (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Cardio disease citation--as promised (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Cadmium Studies Suggest New Pathway To H (1) Bruce Manninen
  
• DOT Emergency Response Phone Number (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Replying to the list, Agent Orange, (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Cardio disease citation--as promised (0) Tony Harrison
  
• Cs and a question, if you please (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Cardio disease citation--as promised (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Cardio disease citation--as promised (0) Tony Harrison
  
• Beckman LSC source leakage (0) James Reese
  
• Re: Cadmium Studies Suggest New Pathway (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: Cardio disease citation--as promised (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Epidemiological musings of a non-biolog (0) Bradt, Clayton
  
• RE: Cs and a question, if you please (0) Mercado, Don
  
• RE: DOT Emergency Response Phone Number (1) Bruce Bugg
  
• Re: DOT Emergency Response Phone Number (0) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• RE: Brazil Nut Radwaste Standard (0) George Sallit
  
• Iodine-131 therapy (1) Engelbretson, David A.
  
• Re: Epidemiological musings of a non-bi (0) epirad
  
• RE: DOT Emergency Response Phone Number (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• Free HP Newsletters 1964 to 2002 (0) Orion1111
  
• Re: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (2) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Iodine-131 therapy (0) Carol Marcus
  
• RE: DOT Emergency Response Phone Number (0) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• virus from my computer???? George Varg (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (0) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: Cardio disease citation--as promised (0) Steven Dapra
  
• No Subject (0) Steven Dapra
  
• The Bomb That Fell--Re:Cs reference (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Manhattan Project Legacy (1) denison8
  
• Re: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (1) denison8
  
• Re: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (2) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: Manhattan Project Legacy (1) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: DOT Emergency Response Phone Number (0) Margaret Rakas
  
• RE: Panic more dangerous than WMD (0) edwin.ilarraza
  
• Re: virus from my computer???? George (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Mossman paper in Health Physics News (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• FW: Epidemiological musings of a non-bi (0) Bradt, Clayton
  
• Re: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Mossman paper in Health Physics News (0) epirad
  
• Re: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• RE: DOT Emergency Response Phone Number (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• ACS Symposium on Environmental Radioacti (0) epirad
  
• NORM pipe scale removal (1) Cehn
  
• Re: NORM pipe scale removal (0) JGinniver
  
• Re: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (0) David Whitfill
  
• Re: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (0) Steven Dapra
  
• NRC Public Meeting (humor?) (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• Who is Louis Ricciuti? (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Amchitka Island Dose Reconstruction (1) Carol Marcus
  
• Re: NORM pipe scale removal (0) Mitchell Davis
  
• Re: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• The Debate is Over (0) EPIRAD
  
• Radiation as religion too--overly zealou (1) NiagaraNet
  
• Radiation Protection Dosimetry and the J (0) E.P.Goldfinch
  
• RE: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (0) Potter, Gus
  
• RE: Radiation as religion too--overly ze (2) Anagnostopoulos, Harry W.
  
• Nuclear Industry Revival In the Making (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• [Fwd: [Know_Nukes] DU symposium in NYC 6 (0) Norman Cohen
  
• DOT Emergency Response Phone Number (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Radiation as religion too--overly ze (0) Frank Scarano II
  
• RE: Radiation as religion TRUE BELEIVERS (2) Vernig, Peter G.
  
• Re: Mossman paper in Health Physics News (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Radiation as religion TRUE BELEIVERS (1) Dave Derenzo
  
• 38,222CPM (4) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Radiation as religion too--overly ze (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Radiation as religion TRUE BELEIVERS (0) Stewart Smith
  
• Re: 38,222CPM (0) Gerald Nicholls
  
• Mutation tolerance affected by environme (0) John Jacobus
  
• Radioactive Rock Found In Science Class (1) Frank Scarano II
  
• Re: Radiation as religion too--overly ze (0) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Senate OKs Plan to Revive Nuclear Power (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: 38,222CPM hope this helps (0) Frank Scarano II
  
• Re: Radioactive Rock Found In Science Cl (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: 38,222CPM (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Radiation as religion TRUE BELEIVERS (1) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• RE: 38,222CPM (0) Marty.Bourquin
  
• The Great Debate Could be Over! (1) Gary Howard
  
• June 14 New York Symposium On Depleted U (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Radiation as religion TRUE BELEIVERS (0) Dave Derenzo
  
• Cancer Clusters (0) Zack Clayton
  
• Re: Who is Louis Ricciuti? (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: 38,222CPM (1) Tony Hedges
  
• Re: June 14 New York Symposium On Deplet (0) willim01
  
• Mutual Understanding and radiation issue (0) Hall, David A.
  
• Re: Radioactive Rock Found In Science Cl (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Radioactive Rock Found In Science Cl (2) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Radiation as religion too--overly ze (0) Mitchell Davis
  
• RE: 38,222CPM (1) Bob Scott
  
• Re: Radioactive Rock Found In Science Cl (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: 38,222CPM (1) John Andrews
  
• Re: 38,222CPM (1) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: 38,222CPM (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Depleted Uranium Controversy Symposium - (0) Stewart Farber
  
• The Puskin Paper on radon and smoking (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Manhattan Project Legacy (0) denison8
  
• Lou Ricciuti concerns et al - Re: 38,222 (2) NiagaraNet
  
• RE: Lou Ricciuti concerns et al - Re: 38 (0) Rogers Brent
  
• A triple negative sentence--inexcusable (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Radioactive Rock Found In Science Cl (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Radioactive Rock Found In Science Cl (0) Kim D. Merritt
  
• Re: Radioactive Rock Found In Science Cl (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: 38,222CPM (0) Peter Fear
  
• NY Job Opportunity (0) MOZZOR MATTY
  
• Re: Amchitka Island tidal waves? (0) M Nivas
  
• Re: Lou Ricciuti concerns et al - Re: 38 (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Nor does it disprove (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Radioactive Rock Found In Science Cl (1) Gerald Nicholls
  
• Re: Radioactive Rock Found In Science Cl (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Natural versus Man-made Radioactivity: D (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: The Great Debate Could be Over! (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Nor does it disprove (0) Mercado, Don
  
• New evidence that power lines do not cau (0) Fred Dawson
  
• Re: 38,222CPM (0) John Andrews
  
• Re: The Great Debate Could be Over! (0) epirad
  
• Re: Lou Ricciuti concerns et al - Re: 38 (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Hamburgers by Crock...Doug Aitken of Sch (1) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: The Puskin Paper on radon and smokin (2) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Uranium hunter follows trail of tiles (0) Frank Scarano II
  
• Debate is over - mistatements of fact (0) epirad
  
• Debate is over - mistatements of fact (0) epirad
  
• Re: The Puskin Paper on radon and smokin (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: 38,222CPM (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Useful Equations, Formulae, and Cons (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Natural versus Man-made Radioactivit (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Uranium ore count rate levels (0) David Whitfill
  
• RE: Useful Equations, Formulae, and Cons (0) Frank Scarano II
  
• Re: Hamburgers by Crock...Doug Aitken of (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Atmospheric dispersion (0) Glenn marshall
  
• Re: Radioactive Rock Found In Science Cl (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Microwave Producing Hand-held Scanner De (0) John_Sukosky
  
• Getting very tired of this ongoing publi (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• pnl.gov and word use (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Uranium ore count rate levels (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Who is Louis Ricciuti? (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Useful Equations, Formulae, and Cons (0) Kim D. Merritt
  
• EPA/NRC MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (1) Doug Schult
  
• RE: Useful Equations, Formulae, and Cons (0) Sun, Lin-Shen
  
• RE: EPA/NRC MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (0) Richard Orthen
  
• Re: Debate is over - mistatements of fac (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Petitioner comments to State of IL lette (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Debate is over - mistatements of fac (0) epirad
  
• RE: EPA/NRC MOU (0) alstonchris
  
• Re: Debate is over - mistatements of fac (1) epirad
  
• Thailand seizes 'dirty bomb' material (0) Tony Harrison
  
• Canada nuclear delay costs British Energ (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Ames, et.al.:Cancer Prevention, Rodent H (0) Stewart Farber
  
• RE: The Puskin Paper on radon and smokin (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• NE Technology Beta Probe (0) User Lastname
  
• Thai police arrest man carrying radioact (1) Nielsen, Erik
  
• RE: The Puskin Paper on radon and smokin (0) epirad
  
• Fw: Environmentalism & the US Constituti (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• A respectable end to radon debate needed (1) Gary Howard
  
• Re: EPA/NRC MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Atmospheric dispersion (0) John Andrews
  
• Fwd: REACT KITS and more (0) Carol Marcus
  
• Re: Thai police arrest man carrying radi (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Fw: Environmentalism & the US Consti (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Cohen's Observation (0) Tom Mohaupt
  
• Assistance needed- Instructions for Use (0) Michael Devine
  
• " Nuclear expert defends the technology (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (1) epirad
  
• Re: Mossman paper in Health Physics News (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: A respectable end to radon debate ne (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Fw: Environmentalism & the US Consti (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: A respectable end to radon debate ne (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: A respectable end to radon debate ne (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (1) epirad
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (1) Les Aldrich
  
• A question of semantics or not? (1) LNMolino
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (0) epirad
  
• Re: A question of semantics or not? (0) James Barnes
  
• BOUNCE radsafe@"list.vanderbilt.edu": (0) owner-radsafe
  
• Re: Atmospheric dispersion (0) Glenn marshall
  
• RE: Cohen's Observation (1) Wesley
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (1) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Cohen's Observation (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• UV attenuation in air (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (1) epirad
  
• Radioactive Refrigerant (0) Elaine Marshall
  
• RE: Cohen's Observation (0) epirad
  
• RE: UV attenuation in air (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Second (2) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (0) Peter Fear
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (0) Gary Isenhower
  
• Re: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (1) epirad
  
• Re: A question of semantics or not? (1) Matthew Rumick
  
• Re: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Cohen's Observation (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• RE: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (1) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• RE: A question of semantics or not? (0) Frank Scarano II
  
• George's Gems plus one (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Weapons Technician Convention (0) Cagle Anthony Capt AFSC/SEW
  
• RE: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (0) Jeffries Cameron
  
• Dukelows LNT comments (1) Gary Howard
  
• Re: Re: Mossman paper in Health Physics (1) Gary Howard
  
• Re: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (1) Douglas and Shirley Jackson
  
• Re: LNT unimportant???? (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Radiation Safety Primer (0) Glenn marshall
  
• RE: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (0) Faillace, Ernie
  
• " Nuclear Heart of the Earth " CNS-SP se (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (0) John Jacobus
  
• Chernobyl beta burn pictures (0) Brian Rees
  
• And Now...The Rokke World Tour! (0) BobCherry
  
• Re: And Now...The Rokke World Tour! (0) BobCherry
  
• RE: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (1) Mercado, Don
  
• RE: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (0) John Jacobus
  
• OLD Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Study (1) Sewell, Linda
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: OLD Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Study (1) Stewart Farber
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) epirad
  
• " UNSCEAR Back on the Job, Jaworowski le (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: OLD Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Study (2) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (1) Shackford, Hobart W
  
• Re: OLD Portsmouth Shipyard Study -Histo (0) Stewart Farber
  
• RE:Instructions for Use for 3M Cs-137 Tu (0) alstonchris
  
• RE: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re "Rokke World tour" and similar topics (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: OLD Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Study (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re "Rokke World tour" and similar topics (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: OLD Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Study (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Re "Rokke World tour" and similar to (0) LNMolino
  
• Feedback - Dirty bomb attack 'a matter o (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Feedback important doc to be downloaded (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• RE: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: OLD Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Study (0) Wagh, Sulbha S.
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: OLD Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Study (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Feedback - Dirty bomb attack 'a matt (0) Fred Dawson
  
• Re: Dukelows LNT comments (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (0) epirad
  
• Hype for the World Tour (0) BobCherry
  
• Re: Dukelows LNT comments (1) LNMolino
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (1) epirad
  
• Question on Plutonium Facility D&D (0) Dave Biela
  
• Scientific responsibility (1) William Prestwich
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• [Fwd: [abolition-caucus] Uranium polluti (1) Norman Cohen
  
• Radon and Lung Cancer: What the studies (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Scientific responsibility (3) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Hype for the World Tour (0) BobCherry
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (1) epirad
  
• Re: Scientific responsibility (0) epirad
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) epirad
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) epirad
  
• Re: [Fwd: [abolition-caucus] Uranium pol (0) Daveandrewswxm1
  
• RE: Scientific responsibility (0) Mercado, Don
  
• Re: [Fwd: [abolition-caucus] Uranium pol (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Fiscal responsibility (was Re: Scientifi (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: "prudent precaution" (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Scientific responsibility (1) Les Aldrich
  
• (no subject) (1) LNMolino
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: Dukelows LNT comments (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: Fiscal responsibility (was Re: Scien (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Scientific responsibility (1) William V Lipton
  
• question on Boral shielding (3) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: question on Boral shielding (0) Richard Orthen
  
• Re: Re: Mossman paper in Health Physics (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Scientific responsibility (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• defense of my comments (0) William Prestwich
  
• Re: (no subject)...But there should be.. (0) John Andrews
  
• Re: RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Obse (0) Gary Howard
  
• Re: Re: Re: Mossman paper in Health Phys (1) Gary Howard
  
• RE: RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Obse (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: RE: RE: Field's comments on Cohen's (0) Gary Howard
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: question on Boral shielding (1) John Jacobus
  
• Searching for a 1Ci Am 243 source (1) Jose L. Gago A.
  
• Small amount of plutonium missing from L (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: (no subject)...But there should be.. (0) hubruce
  
• Re: Scientific responsibility (0) Les Aldrich
  
• now looking for a supplier of Pu-236 sou (0) JGinniver
  
• RE: Scientific responsibility (2) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Re: Searching for a 1Ci Am 243 source (1) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• RE: Scientific responsibility (1) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: question on Boral shielding (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Some history Re:Najarian and the OLD Po (0) John Cameron
  
• Re: OLD Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Study (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Scientific responsibility (2) Steven Dapra
  
• Iternat.transport regs - WHAT's 'low tox (1) Tsurikov, Nick
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Dukelows LNT comments (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Iternat.transport regs - WHAT's 'low (0) Taylor Kathryn
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Re: Re: Mossman paper in Health Phys (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: question on Boral shielding (0) Dave Brown
  
• Re: Scientific responsibility (0) William V Lipton
  
• LNT and resources [Was: Scientific respo (3) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Searching for a 1Ci Am 243 source (0) Richard Orthen
  
• Re: Re: Re: Mossman paper in Health Phys (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Scientific responsibility (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• X-ray Diffractometer/Parts (0) Borisky, Michael (Civ, ARL/CoS)
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Iternat.transport regs - WHAT's 'low (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• RE: Scientific responsibility (0) Mercado, Don
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (2) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (2) epirad
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) epirad
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) epirad
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (2) Gary Isenhower
  
• Synergistic (1) M Nivas
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (0) epirad
  
• RE: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (2) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Scientific responsibility (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Bill Lipton submiital to Petition for Ru (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (2) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Scientific responsibility (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (1) Gary Isenhower
  
• RE: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (1) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) Gary Isenhower
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) epirad
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) epirad
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (0) epirad
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) epirad
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) epirad
  
• RE: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) Gary Isenhower
  
• Concrete Ecologic Example Myth (1) epirad
  
• RE: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) Tom Mohaupt
  
• RE: Synergistic Interaction in the Carci (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• Re: Concrete Ecologic Example Myth (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (1) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (4) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: Scientific responsibility (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) maury
  
• Re: Concrete Ecologic Example Myth (0) epirad
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) maury
  
• Re: Concrete Ecologic Example Myth (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Concrete Ecologic Example Myth (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) hflong
  
• Re: Concrete Ecologic Example Myth (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) epirad
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (0) epirad
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) epirad
  
• Re: Concrete Ecologic Example Myth (1) epirad
  
• Re: Concrete Ecologic Example Myth (0) epirad
  
• RE: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (1) epirad
  
• Re: Iternat.transport regs - WHAT's 'low (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Iternat.transport regs - WHAT's 'low (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) maury
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) John Jacobus
  
• Internat transport regs-WHAT's 'low toxi (0) Boomologist
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) epirad
  
• FW: A Little Poison Can Be Good For You (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• FW: A Little Poison Can Be Good For You (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) John Jacobus
  
• Sr-90 in teeth (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Digital X-Ray Can Scan Body in 13 Se (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Sr-90 in teeth (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) Sonter Mark
  
• Re: Fiscal responsibility (was Re: Scien (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Fiscal responsibility (was Re: Scien (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Scientific responsibility (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the (0) Gary Howard
  
• Re: RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Obse (2) Gary Howard
  
• Linearity of covariates and radon expos (2) epirad
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Iternat.transport regs - WHAT's 'low (1) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Iternat.transport regs - WHAT's 'low (1) Tsurikov, Nick
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Iternat.transport regs - WHAT's 'low (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Concrete Ecologic Example Myth (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• any more news on Thai Cs-137 seizure ? (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) epirad
  
• Re: Cohen's Observation (0) epirad
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) epirad
  
• Re: Fiscal responsibility (was Re: Scien (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Iternat.transport regs - WHAT's 'low (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Iternat.transport regs - WHAT's 'low (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Obse (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Internat transport regs- WHAT's low (0) Boomologist
  
• Re: any more news on Thai Cs-137 seizure (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• How to Meet Today�s Emergency Planning (0) CONTEDU
  
• RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observat (0) Peter.Thomas
  
• ISO ICNIRP document (1) Kim D. Merritt
  
• Re: ISO ICNIRP document (0) Kim D. Merritt
  
• Re: ISO ICNIRP document (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• lung cancers, primary vs secondary (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Linearity of covariates and radon e (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon and Lung Cancer: What the stud (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: any more news on Thai Cs-137 seizure (2) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Chernobyl beta burn pictures (0) Murat Kerimbaev
  
• Environmental Radioactivity and Low-back (0) epirad
  
• Re: any more news on Thai Cs-137 seizure (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: lung cancers, primary vs secondary (2) epirad
  
• ANALYSIS - EC may force British nuclear (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Article: How two students (theoretically (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• Position Announcement (0) Erick Lindstrom
  
• Radon - county linear model and LNT (1) epirad
  
• FW: ANALYSIS - EC may force British nucl (0) Jeffries Cameron
  
• Re: lung cancers, primary vs secondary (0) maury
  
• Re: Radon, Smoking,& LNT (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• RE: Radon, Smoking,& LNT (1) Jeffries Cameron
  
• Re: lung cancers, primary vs secondary - (0) epirad
  
• RE: any more news on Thai Cs-137 seizure (1) Ted Rockwell
  
• Linearity of covariates and radon expos (0) epirad
  
• Re: lung cancers, primary vs secondary (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Radon, smoking and LNT (2) Johansen, Kjell
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: lung cancers, primary vs secondary (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon - county linear model and LNT (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon, Smoking,& LNT (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Radon, Smoking,& LNT (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) epirad
  
• Re: Linearity of covariates and radon e (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: any more news on Thai Cs-137 seizure (0) Peter L. Tarver
  
• Re: Radon - county linear model and LNT (0) epirad
  
• Re: Radon, Smoking,& LNT (0) epirad
  
• Re: Linearity of covariates and radon e (0) epirad
  
• Question on Environmental Monitoring Fil (0) Dale Dusenbury
  
• Re: lung cancers, primary vs secondary (0) epirad
  
• No Cancer Link to Wires (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: Radon, smoking and LNT (2) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (1) William V Lipton
  
• FW: NRC : Notice of Public Meeting of th (0) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• Re: No Cancer Link to Wires (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Radon, smoking and LNT (3) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: No Cancer Link to Wires (0) Steven Dapra
  
• RE: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) Jeffries Cameron
  
• Earth heat production and radioisotopes, (1) JPreisig
  
• Re: Earth heat production and radioisoto (1) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (2) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Earth heat production and radioisoto (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: No Cancer Link to Wires (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) Gary Isenhower
  
• RE: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) Gary Isenhower
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (1) John Jacobus
  
• Earth Core Probe (0) Chuck Cooper
  
• Fwd: RE: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Linearity of covariates and radon ex (1) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Today's solution-tomorrow's problem? (0) Stewart Farber
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Iraqis Suffer From Radiation Symptom (0) Bradt, Clayton
  
• Re: Linearity of covariates and radon ex (2) John Jacobus
  
• ANSI Standard N542-1997 (0) Celia Rajkovich, RRPT
  
• Re: Earth heat production and radioisoto (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Today's solution-tomorrow's problem? (0) Cary Renquist
  
• RE: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) Gray, William
  
• FALSE GODS (0) DWard67262
  
• "Nude X-ray photography at airports in t (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Radon - county linear model and LNT (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon, Smoking,& LNT (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Linearity of covariates and radon e (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: lung cancers, primary vs secondary (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (2) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Linearity of covariates and radon ex (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) John Jacobus
  
• US nukes on Canadian radio (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Radon - county linear model and LNT (2) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: Linearity of covariates and radon ex (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• RE: Radon - county linear model and LNT (1) Wesley
  
• Re: Radon - county linear model and LNT (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Radon - county linear model and LNT (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon, Smoking,& LNT (0) epirad
  
• Re: Linearity of covariates and radon e (0) epirad
  
• Re: Questionable data? (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: lung cancers, primary vs secondary (1) epirad
  
• Re: Questionable data? (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Linearity of covariates and radon ex (0) epirad
  
• RE: Radon - county linear model and LNT (0) Wesley
  
• Cohen's questions (0) epirad
  
• Re: Radon - county linear model and LNT (0) epirad
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Scientific responsibility (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Confounders like Calculus? (Radon - (1) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: LNT and resources [Was: Scientific r (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: Scientific responsibility (2) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: Scientific responsibility (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Upcoming ICRR meeting in Brisbane (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: Scientific responsibility (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Radon, Smoking,& LNT (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: lung cancers, primary vs secondary (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Linearity of covariates and radon ex (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Questionable data? (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Cohen's questions (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon - county linear model and LNT (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Confounders like Calculus? (Radon - (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) John Jacobus
  
• MEXICAN TE/NORM (0) Simmons, Charlie
  
• Re: Radon, smoking and LNT (0) BLHamrick
  
• Severe limitations of ecologic data (0) epirad