Re: COHEN FIELD DEBATE

[epirad@mchsi.com]

Gary,



The answer to your question is yes.  Will Cohen agree?



Bill Field

> Sirs,

> 

> I do think there needs to be a 3rd party to put their view on this

> subject.  May I kindly suggest waiting to see what the NCRP says? Does

> anyone know when their publication will be out?

> 

> If they say smoking data is a problem, Field is right!

> 

> If they say the way smoking is handled did not cause the inverse

> association Cohen is winner!

> 

> I am sure they will address this contentious issue.

> 

> Dr. Field, would you accept NCRP views?

> 

> Dr. Cohen, you said before that the group includes a physicist - will

> you accept NCRP opinion?

> 

> Yes or no is all we need to hear, not another debate!

> 

> Truly Howard -

> _______________________________________________________________________

> LOOK GOOD, FEEL GOOD - WWW.HEALTHIEST.CO.ZA

> 

> Cool Connection, Cool Price, Internet Access for R59 monthly @ WebMail

> http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup/



> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,



> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

> 



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/