Re: Concrete Ecologic Example Myth

[BERNARD L COHEN <blc+@PITT.EDU>]

On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 epirad@mchsi.com wrote:



> The points below answer your question, it is a myth to formulate a concrete

> example when your summary data is so poor.  What you are asking is for someone

> to explain why your data is so bad since you can't figure out why it is

> yielding an inverse association.



	--Please always include the words "hypothetical" or "made up" when

referring to the concrete example I ask for. Thet what make it very easy

for you to provide what I ask.

	I could provide many explanations for why the association may be

inverse, but that is not my job. All I am trying to do is explain why the

predictions of LNT are not fulfilled.



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/