Re: Mossman paper in Health Physics News - The Debate is Over

["Richard L. Hess" <lists@richardhess.com>]

To be clear, which debate is over?



(1) The debate that Dr. Cohen's paper does not disprove LNT is over? (i.e. 

Cohen's arguments do not disprove LNT.)



--or--



(2) The debate over the viability of LNT is over? (i.e. LNT is a sound 

basis for spending billions of our dollars cleaning up sites to well below 

the levels of background radiation.)



If it is (2) then how do we explain the health in Ramsar, Iran and other 

similar places?



IMWTK



Cheers,



Richard



At 10:19 PM 6/5/2003 +0000, epirad@mchsi.com wrote:

>Dr. Cohen,

>

>In Dr. Mossman's editorial he states the debate is over. From the people I 

>talk

>to, most people agree with Dr. Mossman that indeed the debate is over.  If 

>you

>feel it is not, what review group would you accept to make that 

>decision?  Will

>you accept the NCRP's position?





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/