[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No Cancer Link to Wires
>> "What I find quite amazing is that some of the women were so disappointed
that this study disproved the hypothesis that household electromagnetic
fields cause cancer. What a relief it should be that this is not a risk
for billions of people worldwide."
----
> My guess is that the disappointment stems from three things. (Pardon my
cynicism.) First, there is no scapegoat or convenient villain. Second,
the 'electromagnetism causes cancer' believers cannot obtain vast amounts
of tax dollars to finance screening and testing programs.
"Believers" is a key word. Who would try to persuade some extreme sect about
the evolutionary theory? It is the same kind of problem. These people "know"
the causes and explanations and they usually don't care even if their
predictions are wrong. They don't want to be bothered about speciation, DNA
sequences, comparative anatomy (monkeys!) etc.
I have observed for decades now that certain groups fighting "radiation"
seem to _want_ certain risks/potential risks to be there. This is perhaps
particularly true for "EMF" (why define it?...). They are never satisfied
with answers like "this risk is trivial" or "probably non-existant".
With the "believers approach" the irrational becomes completely logical.
Try asking this disappointed woman (I tried to find her email address
without success) to explain why she is disappointed about something probably
not being worth worrying about.
My personal ideas only,
Bjorn Cedervall bcradsafers@hotmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/bjorn_cedervall/
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/