Re: A respectable end to radon debate needed

["Richard L. Hess" <lists@richardhess.com>]

At 03:55 PM 6/14/2003 -0400, BERNARD L COHEN wrote:





>         In my experience, differences are resolved by back and forth

>discussion, with each side understanding and considering what the other

>side is saying.



Mine too, but we seem to say the same things on this list and never 

approach understanding.



I see this in a few other fora as well.



I don't understand it.



Dr. Cohen, do you concur that different mortality statistics and different 

radon metrics do or do not change the outcome of your analysis as proposed 

today by Epirad? Or are these variations in source data "in the noise" as 

far as your conclusions are concerned?



Cheers,



Richard  





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/