Re: No Cancer Link to Wires

[John Jacobus <crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM>]

I believe they are "disappointed" because they want to

have a cause of THEIR cancers.  Without a cause, they

have no way of protecting themselves from the source

of the cancer.  



What is interesting is that while smoking is so linked

to lung cancer, smokers insulate themselves from

worrying about the risk by assuming that it cannot

happen to them.



--- Susan L Gawarecki <loc@icx.net> wrote:

> What I find quite amazing is that some of the women

> were so disappointed

> that this study disproved the hypothesis that

> household electromagnetic

> fields cause cancer.  What a relief it should be

> that this is not a risk

> for billions of people worldwide. 

> 

> My opinion only.

> 

> --Susan Gawarecki

> 

>

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/ny-liemf253345369jun25,0,1446507.story

> 

> 

> No Cancer Link to Wires

> Study: No evidence electromagnetic fields cause

> breast tumors

> By Dan Fagin

> STAFF WRITER

> 

. . .

> 

> "I think 'disappointed' is a good word to use for

> how we feel," said

> Mary Dowden, a nurse and activist who formerly lived

> in Garden City and

> served on an advisory board to the Stony Brook

> study. "I still feel

> there are a lot of questions unanswered," said

> Dowden, who lives in

> Southbury, Conn. "I really believe it hasn't been

> comprehensive enough."

> 

. . .



=====

-- John

John Jacobus, MS

Certified Health Physicist

e-mail:  crispy_bird@yahoo.com



__________________________________

Do you Yahoo!?

SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

http://sbc.yahoo.com

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/