[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: medical misadministration to child



At 01:28 PM 4/4/03 -0600, Michael G. Stabin wrote:

>Two technical problems here:

>

> > From: "William V Lipton"

> > Thus, the dose estimate would be:

> > (5.72 E-3 mrem/pCi)*(400 uCi)*(1 E6 pCi/uCi) = 2.3 E6 mrems = 2300 rems

>

>At this level, dose equivalent has no scientific meaning, one should report

>absorbed dose (Gy preferably, or rad in antediluvian units). Also, "Sv" and

>"rem" are already plural, in my understanding.

>

>There are more up-to-date and detailed dose estimates in ICRP 53 for the

>10-year-old for I-131 NaI of:

>

>790 mGy/MBq at 35% uptake

>1500 mGy/MBq at 45% uptake

>1900 mGy/MBq at 55% uptake

>

>which would suggest doses of 11700, 22000, or 28000 mGy (1170, 2200, or 2800

>rad). That's pretty good agreement with the older Reg Guide numbers.

>Hyperthyroid individuals will have higher uptakes than euthyroid

>individuals, but generally with faster washout. I have not seen a well

>characterized kinetic model for I-131 NaI in hyperthryoid children, so it's

>hard to get much more accurate with the dosimetry.

>

> > The nonstochastic occupational limit for a minor would be 5 rems.  It

> > seems like the patient could expect a "significant adverse" health

> > effect.

>

>We know that the nonstochastic occupational limit of 500 mGy is pretty low

>for most organs, where a threshold of 10's of Gy are needed to show a

>nonstochastic effect (as per experience with radiation therapy). The testes

>can show transient effects at the 500 mGy level, so we set it this low for

>all organs. It is not reasonable to expect a nonstochastic effect at 51 mSv

>(5.1 rem) because we have set an administrative level of 50 mSv (5 rem), 10

>times lower than the low numbers for adults. Children may be more

>radiosensitive, but this low level is based on administrative concerns, not

>radiobiology. Dr. Marcus can probably enlighten us about what, if any,

>nonstochastic effects might be expected from these doses.

>

>Mike

>

>Michael G. Stabin, PhD, CHP

>Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological Sciences

>Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences

>Vanderbilt University

>1161 21st Avenue South

>Nashville, TN 37232-2675

>Phone (615) 343-0068

>Fax   (615) 322-3764

>Pager (615) 835-5153

>e-mail     michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu

>internet   www.doseinfo-radar.com

>

>

>

>************************************************************************

>You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

>send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

>radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

>You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/





Dear Mike et al.:



I would expect no effects at all.



Ciao, Carol