Re: RE: RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observation

["Gary Howard" <radiation@webmail.co.za>]

The off list discussion you talk about was read by everyone in a post

you sent to Radsafe first so how can it be off list?  Let's take this

whole discourse off list.



Can any one start a list for these LNT, Cohen debates?





On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:04:46 -0700 Dukelow, James S Jr

(jim.dukelow@pnl.gov) wrote:



>

>Mr. Howard,

>

>Read my message.  Dr. Field sent his half of what I thought was an

>off-list discussion between the two of us to RADSAFE.  I had already

>responded in our off-list discussion to some of his comments prior to

>his RADSAFE posting and wanted the list to have my arguments directly

>rather than infer them from his comments.

>

>Best regards.

>

>Jim Dukelow

>Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

>Richland, WA

>jim.dukelow@pnl.gov

>

>These comments are mine and have not been reviewed and/or approved by

my

>management or by the U.S. Department of Energy.

>

>

>-----Original Message-----

>From:	Gary Howard [mailto:radiation@webmail.co.za]

>Sent:	Thu 6/19/2003 8:52 AM

>To:	Dukelow, James S Jr

>Cc:	radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

>Subject:	Re: RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observation

>

>Mr. Dukelow,

>

>Why are you sending these personal emails to the whole list rather

>than directly to Dr. Field?

>

>Gary Howard

>

>On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 00:05:01 -0700 Dukelow, James S Jr

>(jim.dukelow@PNL.GOV) wrote:

>

>>

>>Bill,

>>

>>I am sorry if you are offended that I provided the off-list context

>for the message you sent to the list, but I was similarly offended to

>have my positions un-represented and mis-represented by the list

>hearing only one side of the conversation.

>>

>>In particular, I made some specific responses to your questions --

>questions and comments that are repeated in your posting, as if I had

>never responded.

>>

>>I prefer that the subscribers to RADSAFE be aware of my previously

>expressed arguments, while considering your comments.

>>

>>Your posting, which was sent to me and to the list around noon on

>6/18 is essentially identical to a message you sent to me around noon

>on 6/17, a message I had not had an opportunity to respond to, in

what

>I considered our off-list discussion of the issues.

>>

>>Your posting was not sent to the list "several days ago".

>>

>>Best regards.

>>

>>Jim Dukelow

>>Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

>>Richland, WA

>>jim.dukelow@pnl.gov

>>

>>These comments are mine and have not been reviewed and/or approved

by

>my management or by the U.S. Department of Energy.

>>

>>-----Original Message-----

>>From:	epirad@mchsi.com [mailto:epirad@mchsi.com]

>>Sent:	Wed 6/18/2003 2:13 PM

>>To:	Dukelow, James S Jr

>>Cc:	BERNARD L COHEN; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

>>Subject:	RE: Field's comments on Cohen's Observation

>>

>>Jim, this post below was sent to the list a few days ago, your last

>message

>>included off list messages.

>>

>>Bill

>>

>   <snip>



_______________________________________________________________________

LOOK GOOD, FEEL GOOD - WWW.HEALTHIEST.CO.ZA



Cool Connection, Cool Price, Internet Access for R59 monthly @ WebMail

http://www.webmail.co.za/dialup/

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/