Re: Radon, smoking and LNT

[John, Jacobus]

Since no other method arrives at the same conclusion

you do, why is your conclusion correct?





--- BERNARD L COHEN <blc+@pitt.edu> wrote:

> 

> On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, John Jacobus wrote:

> 

> > I think that you say is true.  However, if you

> arrive

> > at a conclusion different from one arrived by

> other,

> > accepted methods, you have the added problem of

> > evaluating not only the results but the

> methodology.

> 

> 	--There is no "other method" that arrives at

> conclusions contrary

> to mine, that LNT fails badly in the low dose

> region.  What are you

> referring to here?

> 





=====

-- John

John Jacobus, MS

Certified Health Physicist

e-mail:  crispy_bird@yahoo.com



__________________________________

Do you Yahoo!?

SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

http://sbc.yahoo.com

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/