Re: Radon, smoking and LNT

[BERNARD, L, COHEN]

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, John Jacobus wrote:



> Since no other method arrives at the same conclusion

> you do, why is your conclusion correct?



	--I was responding to your claim that other methods arrive at a

conflicting conclusion. They do not.

>

> --- BERNARD L COHEN <blc+@pitt.edu> wrote:

> >

> > On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, John Jacobus wrote:

> >

> > > I think that you say is true.  However, if you

> > arrive

> > > at a conclusion different from one arrived by

> > other,

> > > accepted methods, you have the added problem of

> > > evaluating not only the results but the

> > methodology.

> >

> > 	--There is no "other method" that arrives at

> > conclusions contrary

> > to mine, that LNT fails badly in the low dose

> > region.  What are you

> > referring to here?

> >

>

>

> =====

> -- John

> John Jacobus, MS

> Certified Health Physicist

> e-mail:  crispy_bird@yahoo.com

>

> __________________________________

> Do you Yahoo!?

> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!

> http://sbc.yahoo.com

>



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/