Re: Radon, smoking and LNT

[Kai, Kaletsch]

From: "John Jacobus" <crispy_bird@yahoo.com>



> I think that you say is true.  However, if you arrive

> at a conclusion different from one arrived by other,

> accepted methods,



Which data set forces a different conclusion than the ecological data? What

conclusion follows from the ecological data? What conclusions follow from

the data sets that you think contradict the ecological data?



Why not choose a theory that is consistent with all data?



Kai



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/