Get your tickets now!

[maury]

Because Bill Field has now twice suggested that because his

disagreements with Bernie are going no where, they should drop ithe

argument from the list, and



Because John Jacobus has once made essentially the same suggestion as

Field, and



Because both gentlemen have continued without letup to nip at Bernie's

ankles,



It is, therefore, fair to wonder how much longer they will continue and

to wonder if anyone else remains who could possibly have any creative or

original critiques of Bernie's notorious radon study???



Will this become an annual joust like the anniversary of Chernobyl or

TMI on a Mobius strip to entertain the gallery while devoid of new

scientific content? It is approaching the need for a table of points to

be awarded for different criticisms. Extra points should be awarded for

extreme angular momentum, when arguments have become so tightly circular

that they fold back on themselves, threatening to create black holes in

cyberspace. There could even be an annual award on 31 Dec of an all day

raspberry sucker to the winner.



Yours for better popcorn. Smoking permitted only in the second balcony.

All firearms and radons must be checked at box office.



Maury



PS Not to disregard the fact that many good points have been made by all

concerned, but it is remarkable  to note the number of times the same

points are being reiterated by the same people.



maury@webtexas.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/