[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Get your tickets now!



Hi Frank,

I'm genuinely sorry but the circus has become so popular that the regular

tickets have sold out. If we can expand the show with more participants

(ooohhhh nooooo, Mr. Bill, noooooooo) SRO tickets are being considered.

Cheers,

Maury Siskel       maury@webtexas.com

PS Volunteer scorekeepers are needed. Only 6 mos. to go to the awards

ceremony. Beat the crowds; get your ankle biting done early this year.



PPS Applications for new entertainment issues are now being considered. The

only requirement is that your submission must not involve Dr. Cohen -- his

backlog is already overloaded. In fact, his frontlog is also overloaded. It is

amazing how well he bears up under all of this ....

=======================

Frank Scarano II wrote:



> Gees

>

>  Where do you get your tickets from?

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

> [mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf Of BERNARD L COHEN

> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:58 AM

> To: Gary Howard

> Cc: Radiation Safety

> Subject: Re: Get your tickets now!

>

> On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Gary Howard wrote:

>

>   Dr. Cohen has asked others for explanations why his results

> > do not indicate the demise of the LNT.  Don't ask if you don't want to

> > receive!

>

>         --I asked for explanations in terms of not implausible, concrete,

> hypothetical examples. None has been offered

>

> > Field offered reviewers, Cohen rejected them in favor of people who

> > could care less about epidemiology.

>

>         --My work is not conventional epidemiology, which is intended to

> determine dose-response relationships. My work should be judged by people

> who know how to judge a new and novel approach to solving a scientific

> problem, and willing to follow my tightly reasoned justification while

> seeking holes in it. Some epidemiologists (and Mossman) view my work as a

> determination of the dose-response relationship, which I have always pointed

> out that it is not. I see no indication that they understand my tightly

> reasoned justification, or have even tried to understand it. Have you tried?

> If so, can you point out a hole in it?

>

>  Field offered a substative way to

> > find the cause of his discrepancy. Cohen has denied he understands  what

> Field is talking about.  This is why we are getting nowhere.

>

>         --I could understand if he made up a concrete hypothetical

> example. Without it, I cannot evaluate plausibility, so the



--  snipped  ----------



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/