RE: Radon, smoking and LNT

[BERNARD, L, COHEN]

On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, John Jacobus wrote:



> Ted,

> In case you missed the comments made in the past, the

> issue is not his results, but the appropriateness of

> the data to arrive at those results.

>

> If we expect to be taken seriously, we must ensure

> that the data, analysis and conclusions of these

> studies clearly show that the results are beyond

> doubt.  There can be no "wiggle" room for accusations

> that the information we present is unsound.



	--The data I use, for average radon levels and for smoking

prevalence, are obtained from multiple independent sources as explained in

great detail in my papers. Using any one of these independent sources

gives the same result. What other scientific study does more than that?



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/