Re: Senate Bill 1043

[Carol, Marcus]

At 07:53 AM 7/11/03 -0500, Jim Hardeman wrote:

>... and if you think dealing with NRC is fun, you'll just LOVE dealing 

>with EPA. You ain't seen nothin' yet!

>

>Jim Hardeman

><mailto:Jim_Hardeman@dnr.state.ga.us>Jim_Hardeman@dnr.state.ga.us

>

> >>> <BLHamrick@AOL.COM> 7/10/2003 23:48:23 >>>

>In a message dated 7/10/2003 9:27:22 PM Pacific Standard Time, 

>csmarcus@ucla.edu writes:

>

>>I think we have to remove NRC from byproduct material and university 

>>research reactors.

>

>

>I think that the EPA would then fill the void.

>

>Barbara





Dear Barbara and Jim:



There is no regulatory void to fill.  Materials programs were meant to be 

state functions in the Atomic Energy Act.  The states are doing fine 

regulating NARM---do you think we need NRC or EPA for this?



Ciao, Carol