Re: Senate Bill 1043

[Jim, Hardeman]

Carol -



And what makes you think that the imperial federal government is going to voluntarily cease to regulate something that it has been regulating for years? My personal opinion as to whether we NEED NRC or EPA regulation isn't relevant.



Jim



>>> Carol Marcus <csmarcus@ucla.edu> 7/11/2003 7:48:46 >>>

At 07:53 AM 7/11/03 -0500, Jim Hardeman wrote:



... and if you think dealing with NRC is fun, you'll just LOVE dealing with EPA. You ain't seen nothin' yet!

 

Jim Hardeman

Jim_Hardeman@dnr.state.ga.us



>>> <BLHamrick@AOL.COM> 7/10/2003 23:48:23 >>>

In a message dated 7/10/2003 9:27:22 PM Pacific Standard Time, csmarcus@ucla.edu writes:





I think we have to remove NRC from byproduct material and university research reactors.





I think that the EPA would then fill the void.



Barbara 





Dear Barbara and Jim:



There is no regulatory void to fill.  Materials programs were meant to be state functions in the Atomic Energy Act.  The states are doing fine regulating NARM---do you think we need NRC or EPA for this?  



Ciao, Carol