RE: Senate Bill 1043

[Peter.Vernig@MED.VA.GOV]

I don't know why I'm doing this but wrt to NRC listening.

 

I attended a work shop on April 25, 2002 that the NRC held on guidance for

medical licensees in NUREG-1556.

 

Perhaps the most universal disapproval was on Appendix R, Surveys.

 

Yes the NRC listened to the licensed community and then they added about six

words to that appendix and changed not one thing!

 

They listened carefully and then ignored us!

 

Peter Vernig



-----Original Message-----

From: Stewart Smith [mailto:sssmith@scientech.com]

Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 7:06 AM

To: Jim Hardeman; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Subject: RE: Senate Bill 1043





Amen, Jim

 

Working with some people in the USEPA is like being the Red Coats, i.e.,

stand in a straight line while the Colonists fire at you from the woods. I

have found that the USNRC, as a whole, is willing to listen to the

regulated, even if they disagree.



-----Original Message-----

From: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

[mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu]On Behalf Of Jim Hardeman

Sent: Fri, July 11, 2003 8:53 AM

To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Subject: Re: Senate Bill 1043





... and if you think dealing with NRC is fun, you'll just LOVE dealing with

EPA. You ain't seen nothin' yet!

 

Jim Hardeman

Jim_Hardeman@dnr.state.ga.us <mailto:Jim_Hardeman@dnr.state.ga.us> 



>>> <BLHamrick@AOL.COM> 7/10/2003 23:48:23 >>>

In a message dated 7/10/2003 9:27:22 PM Pacific Standard Time,

csmarcus@ucla.edu writes:







I think we have to remove NRC from byproduct material and university

research reactors.







I think that the EPA would then fill the void.



Barbara