[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Senate Bill 1043
- To: E-mail <Radsafe-Digest>
- Subject: Re: Senate Bill 1043
- From: Bradt, Clayton
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:50:37 -0600
I haven't read this latest avatar , but the idea of bringing all radioactive
material and machine produced radiation under NRC jurisdiction has enjoyed a
growth in popularity recently. I have had this conversation before with
Barbara and others in the state radiation control community, and it seems I
am in the minority on this issue (as on most others). I think that
expanding the reach of the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) to include other (all?)
sources of radiation is a terrible idea - for constitutional reasons.
The protection of public health and safety is a State function falling
within the police powers reserved to the States under the Tenth Amendment.
Congress has been granted no express power in this arena and therefore has
at most a supporting role to play. The AEA was originally framed with this
construction in mind. It reserves to the federal govt all aspects of
radiation regulation related to the common defense and security - an express
power of congress, and devolves to the States those aspects which only
pertain to public health and safety. Only when viewed from this perspective
do the definitions of by-product, source and special nuclear material, and
the respective roles of the States and the federal govt in their regulation,
as set out in the AEA, make any sense.
The further erosion of State sovereignty, and the resulting confusion in
lines of authority within our federal system, should be avoided.
Furthermore, there is no compelling need for federal involvement in
radiation regulation except as it pertains to national security.
It is argued that the feds already are involved in public health matters
which are outside Congress' express powers, such as is the case with FDA
regulation of machine radiation sources and EPA regulation of NORM- so why
not expand NRC's jurisdiction? This is the analog of the argument " I've
already had my right arm cut off, why not the left as well"? I don't find
it convincing.
Clayton J. Bradt, CHP
Principal Radiophysicist
NYS Dept. of Labor
Radiological Health Unit
voice: (518) 457-1202
fax: (518) 485-7406
e-mail: usccjb@labor.state.ny.us
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/