Re: radiographer "overexposure"

["Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>]

On 29 Jul 2003 at 7:37, William V Lipton wrote:



> They should have determined whether the processor has a serious QA problem.

> Have they looked at the film?  My guess is that, if they did, they'd see

> that there's a pinhole light leak.



Last comment on this, unless there is a technical question regarding 

film processing, or, NVLAP requirements for film processing, is that 

if there were any light leak, no matter how small, that is one 

benefit of film, it can be visually inspected for all of these 

anomalies, including light leak, water damage, angularity, 

attenuating material over part of the area where a film OD is 

obtained, etc.

-------------------------------------------------

Sandy Perle

Director, Technical

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service

ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue

Costa Mesa, CA 92626



Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100  Extension 2306

Fax:(714) 668-3149



E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net

E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com



Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/