[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OUTAGE TRACED TO DIM BULB
- To: John Jacobus <crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM>, RuthWeiner@AOL.COM, "Flood, John" <FloodJR@NV.DOE.GOV>
- Subject: Re: OUTAGE TRACED TO DIM BULB
- From: maury <maury@webtexas.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 02:31:07 -0500
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 02:39:21 -0600
- CC: "Flanigan, Floyd" <Floyd.Flanigan@nmcco.com>, "Kent, Michael D." <Michael.Kent@nmcco.com>, radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu, Scott Wilson <scottwilson14@suscom.net>
- References: <20030819004203.85532.qmail@web41610.mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-To: maury <maury@webtexas.com>
- Sender: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
John Jacobus wrote:
Since I do not claim to be an expert in this area, I
appreciate your comments.
As a consumer of electrical energy, I remain
concerned about our government not watching out for my
best interests.
====================
Hi John and all the rest of you who have contributed to these exchanges;
First, it surely is obvious that I am not an expert in this area either.
When I spoke about electricity transmission remaining almost totally
regulated, I was thinking in terms of price. Ruth and others have cited
the absence of standards and other factors usually associated with
regulation.
It has turned out that I was unclear about the exact distinctions
between production, distribution, and transmission. Bob Flood helped me
greatly to understand these terms better. Bob, however, said that he is
not familiar with pricing the use of transmission lines. (Bob, how come
your address is John?)
So, you have all been encouraging, carried on a worthwhile debate that
is intimately related to nuclear power, and helped me find some really
important areas of my own ignorance. I have begun the process of
learning answers about the pricing/regulation issue and I will return to
this topic as soon as I can add seriously to it.
Ruth, you have pointed to a truly enigmatic issue which also poses quite
a contrast between your area in NM and in TX. Deregulation in the
absence of competition is meaningless and that appears to be your
situation. But the NM PUC supposedly regulates PNM just as they have for
years -- before anyone ever suggested deregulation. Isn't that the govt
regulation you wanted to protect the consumer while at the same time
mandating a rate structure which guarantees a fair rate of return to the
utility? How the voters of NM make the PUC more responsive to consumers
is another (age-old) question.
In California, wholesale prices were deregulated while fixed retail
prices were retained -- disaster for all concerned. In Texas, retail and
wholesale prices have been deregulated (as stated above I'm in the
process of finding out about transmission line pricing which is reported
to be only about 10% of the cost of electricity anyway.) I will learn
more soon, but believe nearly all areas of Texas can now choose from at
least two companies to buy power.
If any readers can supply information or references that will help me
learn more about this subject, I will be grateful. And in the meantime,
I shall enjoy eating my crow which is thoroughly tenderized in my trusty
pressure cooker. (Down, John, I'll be back) <grin>
Cheers and thanks to all,
Maury maury#webtexas.com
__________
The scientific theory I like best is that the rings of Saturn are
composed
entirely of lost airline luggage. Mark
Russell
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/