RE: some comments from Mangano; all your postings; radsafe secret agents

[John Jacobus <crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM>]

So, what do you think is the problem with the study?



(1) Sr-90 has risen in all areas they studied.  Thus

it is ubiguous and nuclear reactors are the only

source.  Ergo, the likely sources are fall-out.



(2) Sr-90 in areas studies have not been correlated to

control areas not near nuclear power plants.  Ergo, it

is a poorly designed study.



I hope even Norm will understand the problems with the

TFP and their grade-school science fair project.



--- Jaro <jaro-10kbq@sympatico.ca> wrote:

> Thank you Sandy.

> 

> Here's another Mangano absurdity :

> 

> " - Because Sr-90 averages have risen substantially

> in the 1990s in all

> areas we studied, we know it must be a current

> source of Sr-90, not old bomb

> test fallout. "

> 

> Note the clever use of "all areas we studied" -- as

> I said before, TFP picks

> high bomb-fallout areas for their "studies,

> " and claims that any excess relative to low

> bomb-fallout areas is due to

> nuke plants.

> It says something about their opinion of their

> audience, the media and

> public in general: no doubt every scam artist on

> earth thinks he's the

> cleverest dude alive.

> 

>  Jaro

> 

>

http://www.cns-snc.ca/branches/quebec/quebec_main.html

> 

> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> 

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

> [mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu]On Behalf

> Of Sandy Perle

> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:07 PM

> To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu; Norm Cohen

> Subject: Re: some comments from Mangano; all your

> postings; radsafe secret

> agents

> 

> On 19 Nov 2003 at 18:06, Norm Cohen wrote:

> 

> > - The next attempt at exploring a connection is

> through comparing

> > average Sr-90 levels in children with and without

> cancer.

> >

> > And, as I've said many times, there is no

> unexposed control to Sr-90

> > from reactors, because of the wide distribution of

> food and water.

> 

> In essence, he is stating that there is no place in

> the world where there

> can be a control

> population, that being unexposed, insinuating that

> the food chain somehow

> has

> contaminated every single potential person who can

> be considered as part of

> a control

> group. Now that is to use previous words, "silly".

> To say that food is

> derived from areas

> around nuclear power plants, and that this food

> somehow has mysteriously

> "contaminated" every single child in the USA, and I

> assume the rest of the

> world, is

> simply absurd. More reason that this study is pure

> folly.

> 

>

************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing

> list. To

> unsubscribe, send an e-mail to

> Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

> text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the

> body of the e-mail,

> with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe

> archives at

> http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

> 





=====

+++++++++++++++++++

"Eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty and . . . you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing."

Andrew Jackson



-- John

John Jacobus, MS

Certified Health Physicist

e-mail:  crispy_bird@yahoo.com



__________________________________

Do you Yahoo!?

Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now

http://companion.yahoo.com/

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/