Re: medical isotopes - patient expense

[John Jacobus <crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM>]

To your insurance company, you are.



--- "Celia Rajkovich, RRPT" <celiar@andrew.cmu.edu>

wrote:

> No Bill, its more like - As Bob Seger said -I feel

> like just a number!

> 

> --On Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:22 AM -0500

> William V Lipton 

> <liptonw@dteenergy.com> wrote:

> 

> > Until now, I thought that the issue was getting

> patients healthy.  Now, I

> > know better.

> >

> > This is all the more reason why 10 CFR 35.75

> should be upgraded to

> > require written information for ALL nuclear

> medicine patients. This

> > should include:  (1) dose to the patient (CEDE and

> max. organ CDE), (2)

> > dose to others, and (3) impact on radiation

> monitors.

> >

> > I can't believe this would be infeasible or too

> expensive.

> >

. . .





=====

+++++++++++++++++++

"Eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty and . . . you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing."

Andrew Jackson



-- John

John Jacobus, MS

Certified Health Physicist

e-mail:  crispy_bird@yahoo.com



__________________________________

Do you Yahoo!?

Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now

http://companion.yahoo.com/

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/