[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NY Times Article on NRC changes in fire safety rules
- To: "Norm Cohen" <ncohen12@comcast.net>, <unplugsalem@yahoogroups.com>, <JerseyShoreNuclearWatch@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: RE: NY Times Article on NRC changes in fire safety rules
- From: "Ledbetter, Cynthia M." <cmledbetter@tva.gov>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:52:11 -0500
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:56:09 -0600
- Cc: <Know_Nukes@yahoogroups.com>, "Nukenet" <nukenet@energyjustice.net>, <nrc_concerns@yahoogroups.com>, <radsafe@list.Vanderbilt.Edu>
- Disposition-Notification-To: "Ledbetter, Cynthia M." <cmledbetter@tva.gov>
- Reply-To: "Ledbetter, Cynthia M." <cmledbetter@tva.gov>
- Sender: owner-radsafe@list.Vanderbilt.Edu
- Thread-Index: AcO4YvB9lHwafEHUSvmiWnb7TGUuYwAaLBFw
- Thread-Topic: NY Times Article on NRC changes in fire safety rules
>
> But the idea of substituting humans for physical protections has
> attracted some skepticism. In September, at a meeting of the
> commission's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, Dana A. Powers,
> the committee's vice chairman asked: "Is there any hope? It's not like
> you can set up a simulator and test an operator action."
>
> "How do you simulate smoke, light, fire, ringing bells, fire engines,
> crazy people running around?" he asked.
>
> A commission staff member, Eva Brown, replied that in some cases,
lights
> could be turned off to make a drill seem more realistic, and
inspectors
> could check preparations by seeing if air packs were available.
>
> Mr. Gunter, in a telephone interview, said that relying on manual
> actions would mean that plant workers would be counted on to perform
> heroic, or even suicidal, tasks.
>
Nuclear plants can and do set up simulator tests to perform operator
actions, in which they perform a walkdown to ensure the operator action
is feasible under the assumed conditions. Note that the assumed
conditions are worst case and the typical event would not be those same
worst case conditions. They determine (by the walkdown) how much time
it takes to perform the mission to do the manual action and the
simulated plant conditions and simulated plant response.
If the fire protection actions are similar to other manual actions
performed by operators, they would have to address the following (from
NEI-96-07 Rev. 1):
1. The action (including required completion time) is reflected in
plant procedures and operator training programs.
2. The licensee has demonstrated that the action can be completed in
the time required considering the aggregate affects, such as workload or
environmental conditions, expected to exist when the action is required.
3. The evaluation of the change considers the ability to recover from
credible errors in performance of manual actions and the expected time
required to make such a recovery.
4. The evaluation considers the effect of the change on plant systems.
Granted, it is difficult to simulate the emotions involved if an event
occurs. But, I don't think anyone is expected to perform suicidal
tasks, either.
Cindy Ledbetter
Nuclear Engineer
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant
EQB 2N-WBN
423-365-1582
*The opinions expressed are mine and mine alone*
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/