[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Conversion of Half-life Years to Seconds



You're asking the wrong question.  (While you're at it, do you also want to

account for leap years?)  The real question is how to find accurate and

precise half life data.  If you look at the literature, you'll often find wide

variations in half life data among the "standard" references.  I took a quick

look, and found the following half life values for Pu-239:  ICRP 38 shows a

half life of 24065 years, while Kocher shows a half life of  24131 years.

Which one is the "real" value?  Who knows.  In any event, the question of

whether a year has 365.24219 days or 365.25636 days is irrelevant.



BTW:  Although I'm not an experimental physicist, I'd guess that, for

long-lived radionuclides, specific activity is the actual measured quantity,

which is then used to calculate half life.  Rather than trying to calculate

specific activity with false precision from half life data, you should be

searching to literature for specific activity data.



The opinions expressed are strictly mine.

It's not about dose, it's about trust.

Curies forever.



Bill Lipton

liptonw@dteenergy.com





"Leo M. Lowe" wrote:



> I want to calculate relatively precisely the specific activities of

> radionuclides with half-lives that are given in units of years.  This

> requires a conversion from "years" to seconds.

>

> So which "year" should I use: the calendar year (365 days), the mean solar

> year (365.24219 days), the sidereal year (365.25636 days), ....?  (where 1

> day = 24 hours = 86,400 seconds).

>

> Which "year" is used by the standards organizations, such as NIST, when

> publishing half-lives?

>

> Regards,

>

> Leo M. Lowe, Ph.D., P.Phys.

> Principal, Senior Health and

> Environmental Physicist

>

> SENES Consultants Limited

> 121 Granton Drive, Unit 12

> Richmond Hill, Ontario

> Canada L4B 3N4

> Tel:    (905) 764-9380

> Fax:    (905) 764-9386

> llowe@senes.ca

> www.senes.ca

>

> This transmission is intended only for the addressee and may contain

> PRIVILEGED or CONFIDENTIAL information.  Any unauthorized disclosure, use

> or retention is strictly prohibited.  SENES does not accept liability for

> any errors, omissions, corruption or virus in contents or

> attachments.  Information is provided for use "as is" by the

> addressee.  Revised documents must not be represented as SENES work

> product, without express, written permission of a SENES Director.

>

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

> unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

> text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

> with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

> http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/