[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Nuclear Medicine Patients and Homeland Security



Here is a link for the Information Notice mentioned. I could not find it on the NRC site.

http://acnp.snm.org/index.cfm?PageID=1917&RPID=60



Interestingly, with regards to the recent discussion on disclosing the capability of the security detectors, the case discussed in this document involved 370 MBq (10 mCi) of I-131 setting "off a radiation detector IN a tunnel" (emphasis mine). I thought that was pretty impressive. I wonder if the detector was actually in the tunnel. The description does not say where the State Police pulled over the bus but I hope it was before they entered the tunnel. I have noticed on trips to the Boston airport that there is a State Police car parked about 100 yards from the entrance to the tunnel with lights flashing. I wonder what is the point of these detectors. Is it to protect the tunnel from some atomic or dirty bomb or is it just a convenient check point to stop the transit of such devices?



The notice goes on to state that patients containing less than the instruction threshold (259 MBq / 7 mCi of I-131) might still set off radiation detector alarms. Let's see, if that corresponds to a dose rate of 0.02 mSv/h at 1m......



But then again, what difference does portal sensitivity information make? There are so many ports of entry and transport routes I doubt that these detectors are going to hinder the "professional" terrorists. They will more likely contribute to at least two of the terrorist goals: the disruption of our way of life and the diversion of our resources.



Well off to make another revision to our patient instructions. Good thing I had not submitted the last revision (where I added examples of "mass public transportation") to the translators yet!



Hobie Shackford, RSO

Roger Williams Hospital

Providence, RI  

401-456-2471

hshackford@rwmc.org



-----Original Message-----

From: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

[mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu]On Behalf Of William V Lipton

Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 7:26 AM

To: Radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Subject: Nuclear Medicine Patients and Homeland Security





Recalling an earlier Radsafe discussion on nuclear medicine patients who

alarm radiation detectors placed in critical infrastructure, the NRC has

issued Information Notice 2003-22, "Heightened Awareness For Patients

Containing Detectable Amounts of Radiation From Medicial

Administrations."  This Notice describes an event in which a nuclear

medicine patient, who had been released in accordance with 10 CFR 35.75,

alarmed a detector in a tunnel while on a bus from New York to Atlantic

City.  The discussion notes that the patient had disregarded the 10 CFR

35.75 written instructions, which stated that the patient should not use

public transportation for 2 days. Hence, the Notice recommends that,

"...authorized users are expected to evaluate the patient's capability

to follow recommended written instructions before release, to determine

if release at that time is advisable, and stress the importance to the

patient of following the written instructions."



The report also notes that patients who are below the threshold for

10 CFR 35.75 written instructions could still alarm radiation

detectors.  The Notice thus "recommends" that nuclear medicine

licensees:  (1) "... provide all patients that still contain delectable

[sic] amounts of radiation with an appropriate explanation about the

potential of alarming radiation monitoring equipment."  (2)

"...consider providing the patient with the licensee's business card and

written information for law enforcement use..."



In the previous discussion, I suggested that recommendation (1) should

be a regulation, and received many responses saying that the medical

community doesn't need a regulation to do this.  Now's your chance.



The opinions expressed are strictly mine.

It's not about dose, it's about trust.

Curies forever.



Bill Lipton

liptonw@dteenergy.com





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/