[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tooth Fairy Project in USA TODAY
Hi Norm,
It has been my experience that the authors of this article, in
particular Sternglass, have been wont to pick and choose the data that
they report so as to select data that supports their position. The USA
Today aritcle reports the gross information posed by the article, but
does not give any specific information to support the findings. I
always look askanse at these particular authors because of their strong
preconceived notions about how bad radioactivity is. I tend to not
believe anything they say. I am sure that many others reading this list
also have this same feeling. Perhaps you can reassure me that the data
is valid and meaningful by providing us some of the specific information
in the article that was published.
Thanks.
John Andrews
Knoxville, Tennessee
Norm Cohen wrote:
> *FYI
> Norm
>
> Baby teeth offer radioactive clues
> *By Gary Stoller, USA TODAY
> A new study concludes that counties within 40 miles of six nuclear
> power plants have higher levels of radioactive strontium-90 than other
> counties in their states.
> Joseph Mangano holds a baby tooth dating back to 1953.
> By Todd Plitt, USA TODAY
>
> Strontium-90, a byproduct of uranium fission, is one of the pollutants
> emitted into the air by nuclear reactors. If inhaled or ingested, it
> collects in bones and tissue and increases the risks of cancer and
> leukemia, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.
>
> The study, published this week in the journal /The Science of the
> Total Environment/, was done by the Radiation and Public Health
> Project (RPHP), a New York-based non-profit group that analyzes baby
> teeth for strontium-90. Baby teeth from counties near two nuclear
> plants in Florida and plants in California, New York, New Jersey and
> Pennsylvania were compared with baby teeth from other counties in the
> same states.
>
> Nuclear power companies denounce the RPHP study. They and some
> scientists say RPHP's findings are not based on sound science. "I
> don't question finding strontium-90 in teeth, because there better be
> strontium-90 in teeth," says Ralph Andersen, chief health physicist
> for the Nuclear Energy Institute, which represents power plant owners
> and operators. "I question how they compare data. I fail to see a
> factual basis for their conclusions."
>
> Everyone is exposed to small amounts of strontium-90, the EPA says,
> because it was widely dispersed into the environment and the food
> chain by above-ground nuclear weapons tests in the 1950s and 1960s.
> The Nuclear Regulatory Commission says strontium-90 also was released
> into the environment by weapons tests of the French and Chinese
> governments between 1970 and 1980 and by an accident at the Chernobyl
> nuclear power plant in the Ukraine in 1986.
>
> The EPA wouldn't comment on the RPHP study and referred questions to
> the NRC. NRC spokeswoman Elizabeth Hayden says the agency won't
> comment until the study is reviewed by technical staff.
>
> Joseph Mangano, one of five co-authors of the study, says RPHP takes
> no position on whether nuclear power plants should be allowed to
> operate. But its researchers "strongly suggest that the health risks
> of nuclear reactors should be given top priority in formulating
> policies for nuclear reactors."
>
> The study looked at 2,089 teeth sent to the RPHP and analyzed by a
> radiochemistry laboratory in Ontario. It found that most counties near
> nuclear plants had strontium-90 levels that were 31% to 54% higher
> than counties farther away.
>
> The highest levels were found in three counties near the Limerick
> power plant in Pottstown, Pa., and in three counties near the Indian
> Point nuclear facility in Buchanan, N.Y. Pottstown, the study notes,
> is "within 70 miles of 11 operating and two closed reactors, a
> concentration unmatched in the U.S."
>
> The study says its most unexpected finding is that strontium-90 levels
> have steadily risen after decades of decline. Baby teeth of children
> born in 1994 to 1997 had nearly 50% higher strontium-90 concentration
> than those from children born in 1986 to 1989, the study found.
>
> Nuclear experts and the federal government say strontium-90 levels
> should be dropping because above-ground atomic bomb tests stopped
> decades ago, below-ground tests and nuclear weapons production halted
> at least 12 years ago and nuclear fuels reprocessing ceased in the
> late 1970s.
>
> "The only other source of strontium-90 that can explain this steady
> and dramatic rise in the 1990s is emissions from nuclear power
> reactors," the study says.
>
> Robert Alvarez, an Energy Department senior policy adviser in the
> 1990s, says that conclusion is "too much of a leap, because of the
> need to factor in other multiple risk factors."
>
> The EPA's Web site says, "People who live near or work in nuclear
> facilities may have increased exposure to strontium-90." But Patricia
> Milligan, NRC senior emergency preparedness specialist, says only a
> speck of strontium-90 is released each day from a nuclear plant.
>
> The amount of strontium-90 released at every plant is less than limits
> established by the NRC and the EPA, says Stephen Klementowicz, the
> NRC's health physicist.
>
> Alvarez, who is often critical of nuclear plant safety, isn't
> convinced RPHP has proved its case. But he says there may be a
> correlation between strontium-90 in baby teeth and childhood cancers.
>
> RPHP is currently studying whether children with cancer have more
> strontium-90 in their teeth than other children, funded, in part, by a
> $25,000 allocation from New Jersey.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Find this article at:*
> http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2004-01-02-babyteeth_x.htm
>
>
>
>--
>Coalition for Peace and Justice (http://www.coalitionforpeaceandjustice.org); and the UNPLUG Salem Campaign (http://www.unplugsalem.org); 321 Barr Ave., Linwood, NJ 08221; 609-601-8583/37; ncohen12@comcast.net. The Coalition for Peace and Justice is a chapter of Peace Action (http://www.peace-action.org). "You can say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one" (Lennon). "Don't be late for your life" (Mary Chapin Carpenter).
>
>
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/