[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: RE: Nuclear Medicine Patients and Homeland Security]
And what makes you think the medical community is not
accountable? If a licensee violates the condition of
its license or NRC regulations, it is cited. I am not
sure what you expect the medical community to do? In
general, for all medical treatment, the physician is
required to determine if the the patient is going to
follow directions whether it involves radiation or
not. However, a medical facility cannot restrain a
patient who decides to leave. A patient cannot be
restrained against their will without a court order.
It a patient wants to leave after recieving a
significant dose of I-131 for therapy, the facility
cannot prevent it. (If I am wrong on this issue, I am
sure one of the physicians who read this list will
correct me.)
With regarding to compliance of instructions when a
patient is released, consider the following from NUREG
1556, Vol 9, Appendix U, "Model Procedure for Release
of Patients or Human Research Subjects
Administered Radioactive Materials" at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1556/v9/
"U.2.1 Activities and Dose Rates Requiring
Instructions
Based on 10 CFR 35.75(b), for some administrations the
released patients must be given instructions,
including written instructions, on how to maintain
doses to other individuals ALARA after the patients
are released.(Footnote 1) . . ."
"(Footnote 1)NRC does not intend to enforce patient
compliance with the instructions nor is it the
licensee’s responsibility to do so."
So, if either the NRC nor the licensee can enforce
compliance, what is you argument about? What makes
you think that medical licensees are not making a good
effort?
--- William V Lipton <liptonw@dteenergy.com> wrote:
> Accountability seems to be a new concept for the
> medical community.
>
> Yes, I do follow my doctor's instructions. Let's
> get that out of the way.
>
> Having the patient sign a statement of compliance
> would probably be a good idea.
>
> The other issue is that, in releasing the patient
> with a significant radiation field, the
> licensee is making a judgment that the patient will
> comply with the applicable instructions.
> If there is doubt regarding this, the patient should
> not be released.
>
> I don't see the regulators as demanding 100%
> compliance; only a reasonable effort.
>
> The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
> It's not about dose, it's about trust.
> Curies forever.
>
> Bill Lipton
> liptonw@dteenergy.com
>
>
> John Jacobus wrote:
>
> > And what would you suggest? Having the patient
> sign a
> > statement that they would comply with directions?
> How
> > would you ensure compliance once the patient has
> left
> > the hospital or "licensee's control?"
> >
> > Have you always followed your physician's
> > recommendations to finish all of your medications?
> If
> > you did not, then what should we do with you?
> >
> > --- William V Lipton <liptonw@DTEENERGY.COM>
> wrote:
> > > IN 2003-22 implies that the licensee is
> accountable,
> > > to some degree, for
> > > the patient's compliance with the applicable
> > > instructions. Quoting:
> > > "...When licensees are required to provide
> written
> > > instructions to
> > > patients released in accordance with 10 CFR
> 35.75,
> > > the licensees are
> > > expected to, among other things, review with
> > > authorized users the
> > > expectation that written instructions provided
> to
> > > patients will be
> > > followed...." Although this is currently an
> > > "expectation" rather than a
> > > requirement, my advice to medical licensees is
> to
> > > make every effort to
> > > comply.
=====
+++++++++++++++++++
"There's no trick to being a humorist when you have the whole government working for you."
Will Rogers
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird@yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/