Re: 'Dirty Bomb' Was Major New Year's Worry

["Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>]

On 8 Jan 2004 at 14:39, Kai Kaletsch wrote:



> If there is someone running around with a

> bunch of spent fuel or enough Pu to make an effective dirty bomb, then

> the public should know!



I heard an "expert" on TV last night state that food irradiators is 

also a target to obtain a source that could be used to make a dirty 

bomb. My thoughts on anyone using spent fuel, or other high dose rate 

source, such as Co-60 or Cs-137 (high dose irradiator) is how they 

are supposed to actually get to the source, shield it and then move 

it as easily as the "experts" think they can?



I'll speculate that the primary use of a dirty bomb is to cause 

significant emotional stress to a designated population. One doesn't 

need a high dose source to do that. A simple nuclear medicine package 

that spews "contamination" into a downtown area is all that is 

needed. Just look at the fear the public already demonstrates, and, 

this is all compounded by government "experts" who are simply 

agitating the public with their sometimes ridiculous rhetoric!





------------------------------------

Sandy Perle

Vice President, Technical Operations

Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.

3300 Hyland Avenue

Costa Mesa, CA 92626



Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100  Extension 2306

Fax:(714) 668-3149



E-Mail: sperle@globaldosimetry.com

E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net



Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/

Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.globaldosimetry.com/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/