[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: TLD badge dose
- To: "'John Jacobus'" <crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM>, "Suleiman, Orhan" <SuleimanO@cder.fda.gov>, "'Flanigan, Floyd'" <Floyd.Flanigan@nmcco.com>, "Wes Van Pelt" <WesVanPelt@att.net>, "David Hornsey" <bssdjh@BATH.AC.UK>, radsafe@list.Vanderbilt.Edu
- Subject: RE: TLD badge dose
- From: "Suleiman, Orhan" <SuleimanO@cder.fda.gov>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:54:14 -0500
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:02:18 -0600
- cc: "Kassiday, Daniel F. H." <DFK@CDRH.FDA.GOV>
- Reply-To: "Suleiman, Orhan" <SuleimanO@cder.fda.gov>
- Sender: owner-radsafe@list.Vanderbilt.Edu
Yes, they are CT systems.
I know there is/are several surveys on these scanners, but I am not closely
involved with them. NIOSH is conducting one of them.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Jacobus [mailto:crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 3:40 PM
To: Suleiman, Orhan; 'Flanigan, Floyd'; Wes Van Pelt; David Hornsey;
radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: RE: TLD badge dose
When you look at some of the newer scanning units,
they are really CT scanner. I would expect the doses
to be significantly higher than the "standard"
carry-on scanners which are like fluoro units.
--- "Suleiman, Orhan" <SuleimanO@cder.fda.gov> wrote:
> The conventional x-ray baggage security systems are
> very low dose, but some
> of the new federal TSA screening systems advise
> passengers to NOT allow
> cameras with film because of the much higher doses.
> Film is relatively
> insensitive to x-rays (We published a study several
> years go that showed
> medical x-ray film, without an intensifying screen,
> required more radiation
> than a patient did for conventional x-ray
> examinations), so when
> conventional film is precluded from scanning
> equipment, I suspect the doses
> are very high. Unfortunately I do not have any
> actual data for the newer
> systems, but the reported doses are not surprising
> to me.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Flanigan, Floyd
> [mailto:Floyd.Flanigan@nmcco.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:27 PM
> To: Wes Van Pelt; David Hornsey;
> radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
> Subject: RE: TLD badge dose
>
>
> Last week I ran a bunch of direct reading "pencils"
> through the x-ray
> machine at the security check point and checked them
> for accrued dose. 2
> mRem was the average between 60 "pencils".
>
> Hope it helps.
>
> Floyd W. Flanigan B.S.Nuc.H.P.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wes Van Pelt [mailto:WesVanPelt@att.net]
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:26 AM
> To: 'David Hornsey'; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
> Subject: RE: TLD badge dose
>
>
>
> David and Radsafers,
>
>
>
> In my experience, a normal x-ray scan of carry-on
> baggage would give the
> luggage a dose of about 0.1 mrad (0.001 mSv). So a
> dose of 0.14 mSv seems
> MUCH too high for routine luggage scans, even if the
> luggage were scanned
> several times.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Wes
>
> Wesley R. Van Pelt, PhD, CIH, CHP
>
> Wesley R. Van Pelt Associates, Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
> Good morning Radsafe,
>
>
>
> An X-ray thickness gauge manufacturing
> company I work for in the UK
>
> sent three engineers to San Diego for training on a
> particular rig. All took
>
> the TLD badges they were issued with here.
> Unfortunately the Company they
>
> were working with in San Diego did not issue them
> with local monitoring.
>
> They all carried out similar work whilst in the
> States, but one of them came
>
> back with a badge reading of 1.4 mSv.
>
> .....
>
> So - is such a dose feasible for suitcase
> surveillance or could
>
> anything in the baggage compartment of a 'plane
> result in an actual dose or
>
> an artefact? Obviously not a real problem dose-wise
> unless it continues to
>
> show up on his badges, but any thoughts would be
> most welcome to satisfy
>
> both his and my curiosity.
>
>
>
> David Hornsey
>
>
>
> Radiation Safety
>
> South Building Annexe
>
> University of Bath
>
> Bath BA2 7AY
>
> 01225 386540
>
> e-mail:bssdjh@bath.ac.uk
>
>
>
>
************************************************************************
>
> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing
> list. To
>
> unsubscribe, send an e-mail to
> Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
>
> text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the
> body of the e-mail,
>
> with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe
> archives at
>
> http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
>
>
=====
+++++++++++++++++++
"There's no trick to being a humorist when you have the whole government
working for you."
Will Rogers
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird@yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/