[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
U.S. Revives Study of Fallout
Note: I'll be out of the country March 25 - April 11. I do not
expect to be mailing any news distributions during this time
Index:
U.S. Revives Study of Fallout
Ohio Nuclear Power Plant Running Again
Fukui police to set up special unit to guard nuclear facilities
Fukui gov't OKs use of reprocessed spent fuel at nuclear plant
UN watchdog, U.S. want to clean up atomic 'mess'
================================
U.S. Revives Study of Fallout
March 19 (The New York Times) To cope with the possibility that
terrorists might someday detonate a nuclear bomb on American soil,
the federal government is reviving a scientific art that was lost
after the cold war: fallout analysis.
The goal, officials and weapons experts both inside and outside the
government say, is to figure out quickly who exploded such a bomb and
where the nuclear material came from. That would clarify the options
for striking back. Officials also hope that if terrorists know a bomb
can be traced, they will be less likely to try to use one.
In a secretive effort that began five years ago but whose outlines
are just now becoming known, the government's network of weapons
laboratories is hiring new experts, calling in old-timers, dusting
off data and holding drills to sharpen its ability to do what is
euphemistically known as nuclear attribution or post-event forensics.
It is also building robots that would go into an affected area and
take radioactive samples, as well as field stations that would dilute
dangerous material for safe shipment to national laboratories.
"Certainly, there's a frightening aspect in all of this," said
Charles B. Richardson, the project leader for nuclear identification
research at the Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque. "But
we're putting all these things together with the hope that they'll
never have to be used."
Most experts say the risk of a terrorist nuclear attack is low but no
longer unthinkable, given the spread of material and know-how around
the globe.
Dr. Jay C. Davis, a nuclear scientist who in 1999 helped found the
Pentagon's part of the governmentwide effort, said the precautions
would "pay huge dividends after the event, both in terms of the
ability to identify the bad actor and in terms of establishing public
trust."
In a nuclear crisis, Dr. Davis added, the identification effort would
be vital in "dealing with the desire for instant gratification
through vengeance."
Vice President Dick Cheney was briefed on the program last fall, Dr.
Davis said. The National Security Council coordinates the work among
a dozen or so federal agencies.
The basic science relies on faint clues . tiny bits of radioactive
fallout, often invisible to the eye, that under intense scrutiny can
reveal distinctive signatures. Such wisps of evidence can help
identify an exploded bomb's type and characteristics, including its
country of origin.
Solving the nuclear whodunit could take much more information,
including hard-won law enforcement clues and good intelligence on
foreign nuclear arms and terrorist groups. For that reason, several
federal agencies are involved in the program, among them the
Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation.
The program addresses true nuclear weapons as well as so-called dirty
bombs, ordinary explosives that spew radioactive debris.
"It's a very hard job," said William Happer, a physicist at Princeton
who led a panel that evaluated the identification work.
Mr. Happer said he was worried that a rush for retribution after a
nuclear attack might cut short the time needed for careful analysis.
"If we lose a city," he said, "we might not wait around that long."
The effort to fingerprint domestic nuclear blasts is part of a larger
federal project to strengthen the nation's overall defenses against
unconventional terrorist threats. Mostly, the goal is prevention. For
instance, the government recently sent teams of scientists with
hidden radiation detectors to check major American cities for signs
that terrorists might be preparing to detonate radiological bombs.
In contrast, the identification program seeks to increase the
government's knowledge and options should prevention fail. "We're
trying to resurrect some of our capability," said Reid Worlton, a
retired nuclear scientist from the Los Alamos weapons laboratory in
New Mexico who has been called in to aid the fallout endeavor. "It
sort of died. They're not doing radiochemistry on nuclear tests
anymore, so it's hard to keep these people around."
The effort draws on work that began at the dawn of the atomic era.
Scientists working on the Manhattan Project built an array of devices
to monitor nuclear blasts in the New Mexico desert in July 1945 and
at Hiroshima and Nagasaki a month later. The experience helped
scientists learn what to look for.
The first hunt zeroed in on the Soviet Union. In the late 1940's,
military weather planes used paper filters to gather dust particles
around the periphery of Russia, and scientists in the United States
who analyzed the data at first sounded dozens of false alarms, said
Jeffrey T. Richelson, an intelligence expert in Washington.
Then, on Sept. 3, 1949, a weather plane flying from Japan to Alaska
picked up a slew of atomic particles. "That was the real thing," Mr.
Richelson said. Twenty days later, President Harry S. Truman
announced that the Soviets had exploded their first nuclear device.
The ranks of fallout investigators swelled during the cold war as
foreign nations conducted hundreds of atmospheric nuclear tests. By
all accounts, the sleuths made many important discoveries about the
nature and design of foreign nuclear arms.
In time, the ranks dwindled as more and more nations decided to move
their test explosions underground, eliminating fallout. The last
nuclear blast to pummel the earth's atmosphere was in 1980, and the
last known underground test, conducted by Pakistan, was in 1998.
As the terrorist threat rose in the 1990's, the government began to
consider the quandary that would arise if a nuclear weapon exploded
on American soil. In 1999, Dr. Davis, then head of the Defense Threat
Reduction Agency at the Pentagon, began an effort to address the
identification problem by financing research at the nation's weapons
laboratories, many of them run by the Energy Department.
The first money came in late 2000, Dr. Davis said, and the attacks of
September 2001 "made it clear that a very organized event on a large
scale was credible." That perception, he said, helped the effort
expand.
The secretive work won rare public praise in a June 2002 report
("Making the Nation Safer") from the National Research Council of the
National Academies, the country's leading scientific advisory group.
Having the ability to find out who launched a domestic nuclear
strike, the report said, could deter attackers and bolster threats of
retaliation. The report urged that the program go into operation "as
quickly as practical" and that the government publicly declare its
existence.
Since then, weapons laboratories and other federal agencies have
worked hard on the problem. "They're making progress but they've got
a ways to go," said Mr. Worlton, the retired Los Alamos scientist.
In a drill this year, dozens of federal experts in fallout analysis
met at the Sandia laboratories in Albuquerque to study a simulated
terrorist nuclear blast. Mr. Worlton said they were broken into teams
and given radiological data from two old American nuclear tests,
whose identities remained hidden, and were instructed to try to name
them. Some teams succeeded, he said.
Mr. Richardson of Sandia said the laboratory was developing a land
robot that could roll up to 10 miles to sample fallout and return it
to human operators for analysis. It could also radio back some
results if it became stuck. Mr. Richardson said the robots, now in
development, are to be ready in a couple of years.
Experts say a new aircraft for atmospheric sampling of nuclear
fallout is also in development. The Air Force currently has one, the
WC-135W Constant Phoenix, for such work. It was first deployed in
1965.
Weapons experts say getting samples fast is important because some
radioactive debris can decay rapidly. If captured quickly, they can
shed light on a weapon's design.
One way of trying to identify a bomb's origin positively, several
experts say, is to match debris signatures with libraries of
classified data about nuclear arms around the world, including old
fallout signatures and more direct intelligence about bomb types,
characteristics and construction materials.
"If you're talking about a stolen device, you might try to do that,"
Mr. Richardson said. "But if it's improvised, that's less likely to
work. It might not look like things you've seen before."
A further complication is that even knowing who made a bomb may say
little about who detonated it. In a 1991 Tom Clancy novel, "The Sum
of All Fears," Islamic terrorists find and rebuild an Israeli nuclear
weapon and set it off at the Super Bowl.
Federal experts say complex threat scenarios (for instance, an
American warhead being stolen and detonated in an American city) mean
that many types of intelligence might be needed for successful
identification. Over all, it is unclear how much money the government
is spending on the effort.
Private experts offered suggestions for improvement. Dr. Happer of
Princeton, who heads a university board that helps oversee campus
research, said the program might be cooperating too little with
nuclear allies. "It's to our advantage," he said, "for all of us to
share."
Dr. Davis, the former head of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency,
made several policy recommendations last April in an article for The
Journal of Homeland Security. He said the F.B.I. should lead the
program, presidentially appointed overseers should guide it, goals
should be set for how long analyses should take and legal issues of
prosecution should be examined.
In an interview, Dr. Davis said his suggestions had made little
headway, partly because of the topic's grisly nature. "This is an
ugly subject because your best effort is going to be barely
adequate," he said. "That's not the kind of phrase people like to
hear."
Mr. Richardson of Sandia said that the attribution effort had made
good technical progress and had already some ability to identify an
attacker.
"We're hoping for deterrence," he said. "We don't want anybody to
think they can get away with it."
-----------------
Ohio Nuclear Power Plant Running Again
OAK HARBOR, Ohio (March 16) - The Davis-Besse nuclear power plant
started generating electricity Tuesday for the first time since it
was shut down more than two years ago, when inspectors found that
acid had eaten nearly all the way through a steel lid on the reactor.
The plant was restarted early in the morning and by afternoon was
running at 21 percent of full power, producing about 120 megawatts of
electricity, said plant spokesman Richard Wilkins. A return to full
power should take 10 to 14 days.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission gave operator FirstEnergy Corp.
permission a week ago to restart the reactor.
After the plant was shut down in February 2002 for routine
maintenance, inspectors found that boric acid from leaking cooling
water had eaten nearly all the way through the 6-inch-thick steel
cap.
The damage led to a review of 68 similar plants nationwide. Both
FirstEnergy and regulators were blamed for missing warning signs and
allowing the leak to go unnoticed for years.
The Akron-based utility spent $600 million on repairs and buying
replacement power.
-------------------
Fukui police to set up special unit to guard nuclear facilities
FUKUI, Japan, March 19 (Kyodo) - The Fukui prefectural police will
set up a special unit to guard nuclear facilities, including nuclear
power plants, in the prefecture amid growing concerns over terror
attacks on Japan, the force said Friday.
The police will set up the 38-member unit to guard the nuclear
facilities starting March 26 in the first such move by Japanese
police, it said.
There are more than 10 nuclear facilities in Fukui and police have
been guarding them around-the-clock since the terrorist attacks on
the United States of Sept. 11, 2001. The prefecture hosts the largest
number of nuclear power plants in Japan.
But since they did not have the special unit, they had to ask police
forces in neighboring prefectures for backup.
Takashi Ueda, a senior official with the prefectural police, said,
"We have decided to foster a professional unit to guard nuclear
facilities to strengthen our security system."
------------------
Fukui gov't OKs use of reprocessed spent fuel at nuclear plant
FUKUI, Japan, March 15 (Kyodo) - The Fukui prefectural government
gave the go-ahead Monday for restarting a process leading to Japan's
first use of reprocessed spent nuclear fuel for burning in nuclear
power reactors.
Fukui Gov. Issei Nishikawa expressed his intention to allow Kansai
Electric Power Co. (KEPCO) to manufacture overseas the mixed uranium-
plutonium oxide (MOX) fuel for use at the No. 3 and No. 4 reactors at
its Takahama nuclear power plant in the prefecture.
Nishikawa said he will convey the prefectural government's decision
to the company's president by the end of this week.
With the consent, KEPCO is expected to sign a contract with a foreign
company by the end of this month on MOX production and to actually
introduce the fuel at the reactors in fiscal 2007 starting in April
that year, sources close to the company said.
The governor has decided to restart the MOX project, which has been
stalled since 1999 due to a data falsification scandal, after KEPCO
took a series of measures last October to prevent a recurrence of
data falsification.
The measures included stationing KEPCO staff members overseas to
inspect the manufacturing process, establishing a double-checking
system to ensure that manufacturers strictly manage data on the
nuclear fuel, and asking third parties to verify data.
The central government and the municipal government of Takahama,
which hosts the nuclear power plant, earlier endorsed the measures,
which prompted the prefectural government to follow suit.
KEPCO's plan to use MOX for nuclear power generation was originally
approved by the central government in 1998 and by the Fukui
prefectural and Takahama municipal governments in June 1999.
But the plan was stalled after the scandal, in which British Nuclear
Fuels PLC doctored inspection data on MOX it produced for the
Takahama plant, surfaced in September 1999.
Japanese power companies hope to introduce MOX as fuel at 16-18
nuclear reactors by 2010.
---------------
UN watchdog, U.S. want to clean up atomic 'mess'
WASHINGTON, March 18 (Reuters) - The head of the U.N. atomic watchdog
said on Thursday the United States would help it clean up all the
weapons-grade nuclear material spread across the globe to keep it
from from being used in bombs.
International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei met with
Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham to follow up on discussions he had
with U.S. President George W. Bush on Wednesday.
ElBaradei told reporters after the meeting at the Department of
Energy that he and Abraham discussed a number of issues, particularly
a plan to clean up highly enriched uranium and plutonium still in
civilian sites.
"There's about a 100 facilities in 40 countries with research
reactors and others that still use highly enriched uranium (HEU). The
president agreed that this is unacceptable," ElBaradei said.
The atomic energy agency is pushing a plan under which reactors
fueled by HEU would be converted to ones using low-enriched uranium,
which would not be suitable for a bomb. The weapons-grade material
would be evacuated to Russia, the United States or elsewhere.
Both the United States and Russia made reactors that used highly
enriched uranium, though such reactors have become obsolete.
"A lot of it's Russian," ElBaradei said. "There are 21 Russian HEU
reactors around the world."
However, he said, "Irrespective of whether it's Russian, irrespective
of whether it's American, we need to clean up the mess, if you like,
clean up the potential threat."
Asked who would pay for the recovery of the HEU and conversion of the
plants, ElBaradei said: "I don't think the resources are an issue."
Earlier this month, the IAEA supervised an airlift to Russia of
enriched uranium from a reactor near Tripoli, the Libyan capital. It
said the metal was almost pure enough to be used in a nuclear weapon.
Libya has agreed to give up its weapons of mass destruction programs.
The IAEA has often said the chances of terrorists being able to build
a full-scale nuclear weapon were slim. It says the real danger was
that terrorists would make a "dirty bomb" -- a conventional bomb
laced with radioactive material.
A dirty bomb would cause more panic than actual physical damage,
nuclear experts say.
It would take 55 to 80 pounds of highly enriched uranium to make a
conventional nuclear bomb, but a Vienna-based nuclear expert that it
would be possible to make a crude nuclear-fission device with "just a
few kilos" of HEU.
The result would be "a very badly done, but done nuclear weapon," he
said.
------------------------------------
Sandy Perle
Vice President, Technical Operations
Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.
3300 Hyland Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100 Extension 2306
Fax:(714) 668-3149
E-Mail: sperle@globaldosimetry.com
E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/
Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.globaldosimetry.com/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/