RadSafe Archive Mail Index March, 2004

• Thread Index
• [RadSafe Home]
• [RadSafe Archives Search & Browse]

Listing format is the following:

• Subject (# of follow-ups) From
  

• Re: It pays to be Anti-Nuke (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: ANSI N545-1975 standard (1) Thomas M Lashley
  
• Re: 'Sound Science'? Bush closer than b (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Article: Radiation in Water Stumps E (1) Baratta, Edmond J
  
• RE: Hot Lab doors (0) Baratta, Edmond J
  
• Re: ANSI N545-1975 standard (2) Sandy Perle
  
• (slightly off topic question) Re: My det (1) Chris Barratt
  
• RE: (slightly off topic question) Re: My (0) Nathan, Steve
  
• RE: (slightly off topic question) Re: My (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: ANSI N545-1975 standard (0) Sandy Perle
  
• AW: (slightly off topic question) Re: My (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: ANSI N545-1975 standard (0) Thomas M Lashley
  
• Information on U and Th in Tin Slag (1) Anagnostopoulos, Harry W.
  
• Re: (slightly off topic question) Re: My (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• Tritium Signs; Thanks for Info (1) james.g.barnes
  
• AW: Article: Radiation in Water Stumps E (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: 'Sound Science'? Bush closer than b (1) Howard Long
  
• Thanks for virus info (0) Chris
  
• Re: 'Sound Science'? Bush closer than b (0) John Jacobus
  
• AW: Information on U and Th in Tin Slag (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: 'Sound Science'? Bush closer than b (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Information on U and Th in Tin Slag (0) Tsurikov, Nick
  
• Re: Information on U and Th in Tin Slag (0) Jean-Pierre Degrange
  
• Radioactive & Hazardous Material Transpo (1) Claude Laney
  
• Radiation & Public Health Project (0) Jenkins, Ken A.
  
• Good references on the use of uranium ox (0) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• Nuclear Issues Information Source (0) Shackford, Hobart W
  
• Packaging, Transport, Storage and Securi (0) E.P.Goldfinch
  
• RE: Information on U and Th in Tin Slag (0) Anagnostopoulos, Harry W.
  
• The Apollo PA Site/former B&W Site (0) Larry Boing
  
• Thermal issues for Co-60 (2) mark.ramsay
  
• Re: 'Sound Science'? Bush close - see (1) Howard Long
  
• Re: Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It (1) jjcohen
  
• Re: Thermal issues for Co-60 (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Thermal issues for Co-60 (0) Morgan, Ben
  
• Re: Thermal issues for Co-60 (0) daleboyce
  
• RE: Thermal issues for Co-60 (0) Morgan, Ben
  
• FRM-II criticality [FW] (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• HP job at SAIC in the San Diego Area (0) Mudek, Mario D.
  
• NASDAQ TIMER - New Trading Range For TRH (0) Irvin Helton
  
• Department of Homeland Security Standard (0) Flowerday, Scott
  
• Researchers Report Bubble Fusion Results (0) Strom, Daniel J
  
• No Subject (0) Chuck Pickering
  
• Re: Department of Homeland Security Stan (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Department of Homeland Security Stan (3) Peter.Vernig
  
• RE: Department of Homeland Security Stan (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Department of Homeland Security Stan (0) Peter.Vernig
  
• Re: 'Sound Science'? Bush close - see (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It (2) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It (2) BLHamrick
  
• RE: Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It (1) Jaro
  
• RE: Department of Homeland Security Stan (0) George J. Vargo
  
• U and Ra and Algea (0) Dr. Khalid Aleissa
  
• Re: Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It (0) jjcohen
  
• Re: Department of Homeland Security Stan (0) LNMolino
  
• Re: Thermal issues for Co-60 (0) Jean-Pierre Degrange
  
• Re: Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Department of Homeland Security Stan (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It (0) Mark Sonter
  
• AW: FRM-II criticality [FW] (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Department of Homeland Security Stan (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• FW: Exit Signs Recycling (0) Mudek, Mario D.
  
• KI Distribution (0) Nielsen, Erik
  
• Despite risks,nuke power may see comebac (0) Sandy Perle
  
• 50 years on, nuclear blast felt on Bikin (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It (0) John Jacobus
  
• Article on gene expression (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Department of Homeland Security Stan (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• Termination of EML's Performance Evaluat (1) Taylor, Douglas
  
• NRC Intern (0) rad man
  
• Beware 'Sound Science.' It's Doublespeak (2) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: 'Sound Science'? Bush close - see (2) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: 'Sound Science'? Bush close - see (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: 'Sound Science'? Bush close - see (1) Glenn Marshall
  
• Re: Beware 'Sound Science.' It's Doubles (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Termination of EML's Performance Eva (0) Rick Orthen
  
• RE: 'Sound Science'? Bush close - see (0) John Jacobus
  
• No Subject (0) Larry Boing
  
• Re: 'Sound Science'? Bush close - see (0) Howard Long
  
• Recall Lists for Instrumentation; Applic (0) james.g.barnes
  
• APS News about RDD Issues (0) Falo, Gerald A Dr HMJF
  
• RE: Recall Lists for Instrumentation; Ap (0) McLamb, John (NIH/NIEHS)
  
• RE: Job Posting (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: Beware 'Sound Science.' It's Doubles (0) William V Lipton
  
• Article: (0) John Jacobus
  
• more DU propaganda (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Article: Radiosurgery shows promise as p (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: more DU propaganda (1) bobcherry
  
• Re: more DU propaganda (0) John Jacobus
  
• Homeland Security Job Posting (0) Frame, Paul
  
• RE: Recall Lists for Instrumentation (0) MrRMW1
  
• Many more Roger D. Caldwell papers now o (1) Strom, Daniel J
  
• Errors in NRC TMI Factsheet (1) Norm Cohen
  
• RE: Errors in NRC TMI Factsheet (1) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Co-60 solubility (0) Mark Ramsay
  
• Thyroid radiation doses are much too hig (2) Fred Dawson
  
• Re: 'Sound Science'? Bush close - see (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: [Know_Nukes] Errors in NRC TMI Facts (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Thyroid radiation doses are much too (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: [Know_Nukes] Errors in NRC TMI Facts (0) StevenFrey
  
• Re: Thyroid radiation doses are much too (0) George Cicotte
  
• Australasian Radiation Protection Confer (0) Bibbo, Giovanni (MED_IMAGING)
  
• Re: Thyroid radiation doses are much too (1) Carol Marcus
  
• Professional Advice (0) COBDW
  
• TMI and Mr. Cohen (1) Flowerday, Scott
  
• RE: [Know_Nukes] Errors in NRC TMI Facts (0) Baratta, Edmond J
  
• Re: Thyroid radiation doses are much too (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Thyroid radiation doses are much too (1) Stabin, Michael
  
• EIS exemption for Libyan nuclear cargo (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Dose Calibrator Linearity, A Historical (0) Vernig, Peter G.
  
• ASTM D 1888 Particulate and Disolved Mat (0) Christopher W. Becker
  
• NUREG-1505 Electronic file needed (0) ERGKBAKER
  
• Re: [Know_Nukes] Errors in NRC TMI Facts (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Thyroid radiation doses are much too (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: TMI and Mr. Cohen (1) Conklin, Al
  
• Re: Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: TMI and Mr. Cohen (1) Norm Cohen
  
• TMI (0) Bill Prestwich
  
• Strength of chemical bounds, Carbon-Trit (1) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• Re: Many more Roger D. Caldwell papers n (0) Niel Wald
  
• Developing an MS Access Activity Calcula (0) David Gillum
  
• AW: TMI and Mr. Cohen (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Strength of chemical bounds, Carbon- (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Thyroid radiation doses are much too (2) Neil, David M
  
• RE: more DU propaganda (0) Neil, David M
  
• Re: Developing an MS Access Activity Cal (0) Gv1
  
• RE: Thyroid radiation doses are much too (0) Carol Marcus
  
• RE: Thyroid radiation doses are much too (1) Cheng Kit-man
  
• RE: Thyroid radiation doses are much too (0) Carol Marcus
  
• Re: AW: TMI and Mr. Cohen (0) Raymond A Hoover
  
• RE: Errors in NRC TMI Factsheet (1) Doug Aitken
  
• X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (1) iradi8
  
• RE: Errors in NRC TMI Factsheet (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Luck and analysis (2) Brian Rees
  
• Re: X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (0) John Jacobus
  
• Help! (0) Jay Beckel
  
• RE: X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (0) Shackford, Hobart W
  
• RE: X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (2) Parry, Don (CIS)
  
• Re: Luck and analysis (1) HP Dean
  
• RE: X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (0) John Jacobus
  
• RG&E files plan to keep rates flat, sell (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Reminder - IRB News You Can Use (0) Institutional_Review_Board
  
• Article: Approval of Irradiated Sweet Po (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Luck and analysis (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Luck and analysis (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Health Physics Technician Positions -- D (0) Dan Hoffman
  
• RE: Article: Approval of Irradiated Swee (1) John R Johnson
  
• re: TMI (1) Thomas E. Potter
  
• RE: TMI (0) George J. Vargo
  
• Algae (2) Dr. Khalid Aleissa
  
• RE: Article: Approval of Irradiated Swee (1) George J. Vargo
  
• RE: Errors in NRC TMI Factsheet (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: Luck and analysis (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (0) Bill.Teer
  
• Re: X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (3) Thomas M Lashley
  
• RE: Help! (0) Falo, Gerald A Dr HMJF
  
• RE: Article: Approval of Irradiated Swee (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (2) John Jacobus
  
• Re: X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Help! (Basement radiation surveys) (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• Medical Events Reporting (1) Shackford, Hobart W
  
• Re: Article: Approval of Irradiated Swee (0) HP Dean
  
• Missing Exit Signs (2) Williamson, Matthew/Medical Physics
  
• Re: Help! (Basement radiation surveys) (0) Frank Helk
  
• RE: Algae (0) John R Johnson
  
• RE: Luck and analysis (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (1) Sandra
  
• RE: Algae (0) Lepzelter Berry, Carol G.
  
• help (0) Michael R. Dupray
  
• Re: Medical Events Reporting (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Algae (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Re: X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (1) David Englehart
  
• RE: Algae (0) Jim Otton
  
• Re: X-Rays at Podiatrist Office (0) John Jacobus
  
• Algae/biomagnification (0) Scott Osborn
  
• UK report Health effects of pollutant pa (0) Fred Dawson
  
• Re: Missing Exit Signs (0) Bradt, Clayton
  
• AW: Missing Exit Signs (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• DOE Office of Science Issues Strategic P (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Thyroid radiation doses are much too (0) Neil, David M
  
• Re: Missing Exit Signs (1) jjcohen
  
• Re: Missing Exit Signs (2) Carol Marcus
  
• Re: AW: Missing Exit Signs (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: Missing Exit Signs (2) Jaro
  
• RE: Missing Exit Signs (0) John Jacobus
  
• BWCHPS/AIHA Joint Meeting: Wednesday, Ma (0) Fischer, Karl (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• RE: Missing Exit Signs (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Position Sr. Health Physicist - Radiolog (0) DeMers, Joseph W
  
• RE: Missing Exit Signs (1) Anagnostopoulos, Harry W.
  
• RE: Missing Exit Signs (0) John R Johnson
  
• background count rate (0) John Stiver
  
• RE: Missing Exit Signs (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Missing Exit Signs (1) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• RE: Missing Exit Signs (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• RE: Missing Exit Signs (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Missing Exit Signs (0) Anagnostopoulos, Harry W.
  
• Re: Missing Exit Signs (0) JDNUKE52
  
• Re: Missing Exit Signs (0) JDNUKE52
  
• RAD Worker CBT Course (0) Moore,Paul
  
• News item: Important Hearings on Homela (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Missing Exit Signs (2) Bernard L. Cohen
  
• Current Issue of BMJ (0) alstonchris
  
• Nuclear missile allegedly damaged (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• Re: Missing Exit Signs (0) JDNUKE52
  
• Nuke shipments are safe (0) Nielsen, Erik
  
• RE: Missing Exit Signs (0) John R Johnson
  
• "Uncontrolled" radiation in my youth [wa (2) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: Nuclear missile allegedly damaged (0) Danny K McClung
  
• Re: Nuclear missile allegedly damaged (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• Re: Nuclear missile allegedly damaged (0) Paul_Prichard
  
• Radiation filtering proposed for water (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: Nuclear missile allegedly damaged (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Federal Register: EPA extends comment p (0) John Jacobus
  
• Fwd: [CPEO-MEF] IEER Press Release (0) Philip Egidi
  
• A Rouge Spear (not to be confused with R (0) Danny K McClung
  
• RE: Current Issue of BMJ (1) alstonchris
  
• Re: Radiation filtering proposed for wat (0) Dr. Khalid Aleissa
  
• RE: Current Issue of BMJ (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: A Rouge Spear (not to be confused wi (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• Decommissioning Robot Needs A Good Home (0) Urciuolo, Louis
  
• BMJ study question (1) JOHN.RICH
  
• Screening Techniques: Goiania (1) Carol Marcus
  
• Re: "Uncontrolled" radiation in my youth (1) Mark Sonter
  
• Re: Screening Techniques: Goiania (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• ACCIDENTAL OVEREXPOSURE OF RADIOTHERAPY (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• AW: "Uncontrolled" radiation in my youth (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Current Issue of BMJ - JUNK (0) Howard Long
  
• Article on Yucca Mountain on Technology (1) Tosh Ushino
  
• Re: Article on Yucca Mountain on Technol (0) daleboyce
  
• RE: "Uncontrolled" radiation in my youth (0) Chris
  
• Re: Yucca Mountain article (0) daleboyce
  
• (Fwd) (ANSI-HSSP.014) Newsletter #03 - M (0) Sandy Perle
  
• AW: Missing Exit Signs (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Information on Goiania (0) Carol Marcus
  
• The 2004 edition of The American Medical (0) Wilfredo Grace
  
• Article: Report targets nuclear dump (S (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• Copy of Richardson's moratorium on relea (0) Rick Haaker
  
• AW: Missing Exit Signs (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Article: Report targets nuclear dum (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Article: Report targets nuclear dum (1) Jim Hardeman
  
• RE: "Uncontrolled" radiation in my youth (0) Karl Ellison
  
• RE: BMJ study question (0) Rick Orthen
  
• RE: Article: Report targets nuclear dum (1) Rick Orthen
  
• Re: Article: Report targets nuclear dum (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: AW: Missing Exit Signs (2) John Jacobus
  
• Re: AW: Missing Exit Signs (0) John Jacobus
  
• No Subject (1) Larry Boing
  
• Re: Article: Report targets nuclear dum (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: (1) Charly Frey
  
• Hammer dosimeter (0) BRISSON Nicolas
  
• RE: (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Re: (0) William V Lipton
  
• radiography again (and again and again) (0) William V Lipton
  
• AW: AW: Missing Exit Signs (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Decommissioning Robot Needs A Good Home (0) Urciuolo, Louis
  
• RE: (1) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• RE: AW: Missing Exit Signs (1) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Jury Awards Butter-Flavor Worker $20M (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Jury Awards Butter-Flavor Worker $20 (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Position: Rad Safety Ass't (0) Cynthia.Goodman-Mumm
  
• Help Regarding Export of Source Material (1) Ken Smith
  
• RE: Help Regarding Export of Source Mate (0) John R Johnson
  
• Re: Jury Awards Butter-Flavor Worker $20 (0) Sandy Perle
  
• AW: AW: Missing Exit Signs (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: ?????? (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: AW: Missing Exit Signs (1) John R Johnson
  
• Re: Jury Awards Butter-Flavor Worker $20 (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: AW: Missing Exit Signs (0) JDNUKE52
  
• FWIMBW (2) LNMolino
  
• Re: FWIMBW - Chernobly link -Horrible En (0) LNMolino
  
• Re: FWIMBW (1) J. Marshall Reber
  
• Re: FWIMBW (0) LNMolino
  
• Re: FWIMBW (0) maury
  
• RE: FWIMBW - Chernobly link -Horrible En (1) NORTH, Ralph
  
• Information on derivation of DCGLs at Fe (0) Anagnostopoulos, Harry W.
  
• FWIMBW - Chernobly link -Horrible Englis (0) Charly Frey
  
• Nevada Sues Feds, Again (0) HP Dean
  
• Re: FWIMBW (1) Raymond A Hoover
  
• LEAD APRONS: TIME FOR CHANGE ??? (2) Lori White
  
• Radiaition Protection Degree (1) Charly Frey
  
• RE: Radiaition Protection Degree (0) Morgan, Ben
  
• Re: LEAD APRONS: TIME FOR CHANGE ??? (1) Daniel F. Kane
  
• Re: LEAD APRONS: TIME FOR CHANGE ??? (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Radiaition Protection Degree (0) John Jacobus
  
• News Article: Senate Appropriations Hea (0) John Jacobus
  
• 1) Missing Exit Signs - 2) Tritium fatal (2) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• " NASA PARTNERS WITH DEPARTMENT OF ENERG (0) Jaro
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Howard Long
  
• RE: 2) Tritium fatality (0) =?utf-8?B?15PXkSDXkdeo15nXp9eg16g=?=
  
• NORM Conference proceedings (0) Dr. Khalid Aleissa
  
• Tritium Fatality (0) Schlenker, Gerald
  
• Re: LEAD APRONS: TIME FOR CHANGE ??? (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (2) Gerry Blackwood
  
• Replicate Measurements (0) Radconpro
  
• Addressing the Unthinkable, U.S. Revives (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• NORM Conference proceedings (0) Dr. Khalid Aleissa
  
• RE: 2) Tritium fatality (3) =?UTF-8?B?15PXkSDXkdeo15nXp9eg16g=?=
  
• Re: Addressing the Unthinkable, U.S. Rev (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• Re: " NASA PARTNERS WITH DEPARTMENT OF E (2) DWard67262
  
• U.S. Revives Study of Fallout (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Report urges power-short Ontario to go n (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: " NASA PARTNERS WITH DEPARTMENT OF E (0) John Jacobus
  
• Tritium fatality (0) Schlenker, Gerald
  
• RE: Report urges power-short Ontario to (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (2) Howard Long
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: 2) Tritium fatality (0) John R Johnson
  
• Re: 2) Tritium fatality (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• AW: 2) Tritium fatality (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Gerry Blackwood
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Flood, John
  
• Re: AW: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapon (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Soluble uranium chemical intake limits - (2) Huey0001
  
• Re: " NASA PARTNERS WITH DEPARTMENT OF E (0) Rad Con Dean
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Howard Long
  
• AW: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Small time researching looking to get li (0) Steve Packard
  
• AW: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: AW: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapon (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Sun, Lin-Shen
  
• Rad Worker Clip Art (0) Ziegler, Susanne E.
  
• Re: 2) Tritium fatality (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• RE Al Qaieda... Congo authorities seize (0) LancerGT
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) garyi
  
• Article: Adolescent cancer rising, and s (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Strickert, Rick
  
• Sealed sources 'round the world (1) Bob Westerdale
  
• Beta dose in air? (1) John R Johnson
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) garyi
  
• Article: N.J. Gets Seaport Radiation Det (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Exploranium Email Contacts (2) james.g.barnes
  
• Re: Beta dose in air? (0) David Matchick
  
• RE: Exploranium Email Contacts (1) John R Johnson
  
• Re: RE Al Qaieda... Congo authorities se (0) Gv1
  
• RE: Knee jerk retaliation (0) Zack Clayton
  
• RE: Article: N.J. Gets Seaport Radiation (0) Rick Orthen
  
• Exploranium Contacts (0) GRAHNK
  
• RE: Knee jerk retaliation (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: Exploranium Email Contacts (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Investors: OSSI, the Next Ditech, Lendin (0) Gina Kessler
  
• Re: Soluble uranium chemical intake limi (0) thomas.labone
  
• Sources around the world (0) James W. Tracy
  
• RadSafe: Beta dose in air? (0) Pete_Bailey
  
• Exploranium Contacts: Got what I need, (0) james.g.barnes
  
• Re: Soluble uranium chemical intake limi (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• re: NJ Gets Seaport Radiation Detector (2) Michael J Vala
  
• RE: Knee jerk retaliation (1) Strickert, Rick
  
• re: NJ Gets Seaport Radiation Detector (1) Sandy Perle
  
• FW: Beta dose in air? (0) John R Johnson
  
• re: NJ Gets Seaport Radiation Detector (0) John Jacobus
  
• Ron Kathren's Compilation of Herb Parker (2) Falo, Gerald A Dr HMJF
  
• AW: Knee jerk retaliation (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Knee jerk retaliation (1) Strickert, Rick
  
• RE: NJ Gets Seaport Radiation Detector (0) Rick Orthen
  
• RE: Ron Kathren's Compilation of Herb Pa (0) George J. Vargo
  
• AW: Knee jerk retaliation (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Ron Kathren's Compilation of Herb Pa (0) Falo, Gerald A Dr HMJF
  
• Re: Sealed sources 'round the world (0) Roy Parker
  
• RE: Ron Kathren's Compilation of Herb Pa (0) Garner, William
  
• RE: Ron Kathren's Compilation of Herb Pa (0) John R Johnson
  
• Pictures of Shipping Containers (1) conrad sherman
  
• Total Effective Dose and Total Effective (1) Strom, Daniel J
  
• RE: NJ Gets Seaport Radiation Detector (1) Tsurikov, Nick
  
• AW: Pictures of Shipping Containers (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: NJ Gets Seaport Radiation Detector (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• Re: AW: Pictures of Shipping Containers (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: NJ Gets Seaport Radiation Detector (0) John Jacobus
  
• NIOSH Reconstruction Western NY worthles (1) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Gv1
  
• Re: FW: Beta dose in air? (0) Gv1
  
• RE: NJ Gets Seaport Radiation Detector (0) Mercado, Don
  
• Re: NIOSH Reconstruction Western NY wort (0) Raymond A Hoover
  
• RE: Total Effective Dose and Total Effec (1) Strom, Daniel J
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) jjcohen
  
• Ray2Hoover Bethlehem Steel dose reconstr (1) NiagaraNet
  
• Old Radiological Surveys (0) NiagaraNet
  
• networked radiation control (0) John Baza
  
• RE: Ray2Hoover Bethlehem Steel dose reco (0) Mercado, Don
  
• RE: Ray2Hoover Bethlehem Steel dose reco (0) Gardner, Shane
  
• Slightly off topic, but apropos (0) Neil, David M
  
• Societies issue primer on radiological t (2) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Slightly off topic, but apropos (1) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: NIOSH Reconstruction Western NY wor (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Total Effective Dose and Total Effec (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: NJ Gets Seaport Radiation Detector (0) Cary Renquist
  
• Re: Ray2Hoover Bethlehem Steel dose reco (0) Raymond A Hoover
  
• RE: networked radiation control (0) Michael Ring
  
• Re: Slightly off topic, but apropos (0) hubruce
  
• Re: Total Effective Dose and Total Effec (0) Raymond A Hoover
  
• Exempt Consignment Value (0) David Watkins
  
• RE: Slightly off topic, but apropos (0) Neil, David M
  
• Record Retention Requirement (2) Nielsen, Erik
  
• Re: Record Retention Requirement (0) Sandy Perle
  
• " New ICRP guidelines to 'clarify' colle (2) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: " New ICRP guidelines to 'clarify' c (0) jjcohen
  
• Re: Record Retention Requirement (0) Raymond A Hoover
  
• Re: Societies issue primer on radiologic (1) Howard Long
  
• Re: Societies issue primer on radiologic (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: " New ICRP guidelines to 'clarify' c (1) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re:How to Lie With Statistics (0) Mike Bohan
  
• RE: Societies issue primer on radiologic (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: networked radiation control (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Societies issue primer on radiologic (2) David V. Becker
  
• RE: Societies issue primer on radiologic (1) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• OTP Humor "Fanatics" (0) NiagaraNet
  
• KI and nuclear weapons (0) james.g.barnes
  
• Re: " New ICRP guidelines to 'clarify' c (0) BLHamrick
  
• Surgical Probe for F-18 (0) Carol Marcus
  
• Thank you Re: Bethlehem Steel, Vitkis an (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Societies issue primer on radiologic (0) Suleiman, Orhan
  
• RE: Societies issue primer on radiologic (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Societies issue primer on radiologic (0) mark.hogue
  
• Re: " New ICRP guidelines to 'clarify' c (2) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Societies issue primer on radiologic (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Societies issue primer on radiologic (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: " New ICRP guidelines to 'clarify' c (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: How to lie with statistics (0) Haskell, Larry
  
• RE: Societies issue primer on radiologic (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: " New ICRP guidelines to 'clarify' c (2) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: " New ICRP guidelines to 'clarify' c (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: " New ICRP guidelines to 'clarify' c (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Societies issue primer on radiologic (1) Howard Long
  
• DOT shipping topic: Emergency response n (0) Engelbretson, David A.
  
• Re: Bethlehem Steel, Vitkis and comment (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: " New ICRP guidelines to 'clarify' c (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Societies issue primer on radiologic (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Bethlehem Steel, Vitkis and comment (0) John Jacobus
  
• FEMA Publication (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Societies issue primer on radiologic (0) John Jacobus
  
• Supersonic Cerenkov (0) John Jacobus
  
• REMS reporting (0) Jay Beckel
  
• RE: DOT shipping topic: Emergency respon (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• Opportunity (0) Anagnostopoulos, Harry W.
  
• Extra LSC (0) Williamson, Matthew/Medical Physics
  
• Nuclear-powered pacemakers (0) Gibbs, S Julian
  
• Re: " New ICRP guidelines to 'clarify' c (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: DOT shipping topic: Emergency respon (0) MTDramENF
  
• Thank you Ruth Weiner (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Thank you Ruth Weiner (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Thank you Ruth Weiner (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Bethlehem workers and Western NY State (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Bethlehem workers and Western NY State (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Bethlehem workers and Western NY Sta (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Bethlehem workers and Western NY St (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Bethlehem workers and Western NY St (2) Steven Dapra
  
• AW: Bethlehem workers and Western NY Sta (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• KI and Bush (0) Norm Cohen
  
• Re: Preventive health care: "Chronic Rad (1) Howard Long
  
• Re: Societies issue primer on radiologic (1) Howard Long
  
• Re: Bethlehem workers and Western NY Sta (0) RuthWeiner
  
• NIOSH Report was Bethlehem-also Kidney c (0) NiagaraNet
  
• More on Compensation (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: More on Compensation (0) Harry Hinks
  
• TMI (1) Harry Hinks
  
• Love Canal (1) Harry Hinks
  
• AW: TMI (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Exploranium Email Contacts (0) ECS/Overwatch
  
• RE: Love Canal, LONG (0) Michael Kay
  
• Re: Love Canal (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Love Canal (0) niton
  
• Love Canal info incorrect Weiner and Dap (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Bethlehem and Ruth Weiner--Adding insult (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Love Canal, radionuclides and wasted tim (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Bethlehem workers and Western NY St (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Societies issue primer on radiologic (0) John Jacobus
  
• No Subject (0) Larry Boing
  
• Re: personal detectors/dosimeters (0) Robert Feldman
  
• RE: (0) Morgan, Ben
  
• Re: Preventive health care: "Chronic Rad (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Record Retention Requirement (2) Morgan, Ben
  
• RE: KI and Bush (0) Sinclair, Michael
  
• Re: Record Retention Requirement (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Record Retention Requirement (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Gv1
  
• Re: Record Retention Requirement (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) George J. Vargo
  
• Re: Love Canal (0) Bradt, Clayton
  
• Love Canal reference from Weiner - Dapra (1) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Taiwan, cobalt-60 (1) Howard Long
  
• Re: Love Canal (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Love Canal reference from Weiner - D (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Love Canal (0) Bradt, Clayton
  
• Outdated Love Canal reference from Weine (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Bethlehem, insult to injury and small wo (0) NiagaraNet
  
• RE: Outdated Love Canal reference from W (1) Mercado, Don
  
• Re: Outdated Love Canal reference from W (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Historical Items (1) hubruce
  
• RE: Outdated Love Canal reference from W (0) Carl Speer
  
• Outdated Levine Canal - What? (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Outdated Love Canal reference from W (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Health Physics Society Summer School (0) Brt4702
  
• Re: Outdated Love Canal reference from W (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Historical Items (0) hubruce
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Love Canal reference from Weiner - D (0) John Jacobus
  
• 2004 HPS Summer School registration, "Pu (0) James Clark
  
• Local Research Credentials (1) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: Taiwan, cobalt-60 (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Local Research Credentials (0) Flood, John
  
• Re: Local Research Credentials (1) John Jacobus
  
• a Chernobyl question (0) Ansari, Armin
  
• Re: Local Research Credentials (0) Tom Hazlett
  
• This one will fly on a frenzied wave of (0) Bennett Larsen
  
• RE: Outdated Love Canal reference from W (1) RuthWeiner
  
• NEW YORK STATE CANCER INITIATIVE Zip Cod (1) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: NEW YORK STATE CANCER INITIATIVE Zip (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Love Canal: Understanding nonscience (0) jjcohen
  
• Article: At the Center of the Storm Ove (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Love Canal: Understanding nonscience (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Love Canal: Understanding nonscience (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Crispy request for further cancer data.. (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Low-level Rn exposure and lung cancer (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Crispy request for further cancer d (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Article: At the Center of the Stor (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Local Research Credentials (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Re: FWIMBW--Chernobyl tour / mortality f (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: Article: At the Center of the Storm (0) Rogers Brent
  
• Re: Outdated Love Canal reference from W (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Article: At the Center of the Storm (0) BLHamrick