Re: Ray2Hoover Bethlehem Steel dose reconstruction

[Raymond A Hoover <ray2hoover@YAHOO.COM>]

Perhaps instead of engaging in a you said, he said argument you can merely post one of your articles from the Art Voice and let everyone judge for themselves.

 

As for me, I'll pass.  As I see it, it is a no win situation for me.  I spend a lot time on it, and I am unlikly to change your mind and most of the subscribers here won't get anything out of it at all.

 



NiagaraNet@aol.com wrote:

Hey Mr. Hoover (Ray):   Re: Bethlehem Steel dose reconstruction flop...



I'm not really anti-anything. My father worked on The Project. I didn't file any claims. I pledge to the flag, God and all. Get it? The only thing I'm Anti - is responsibility and recognition. That's all. If you don't like the comment about MJW, perhaps you work there?



Mr. Hoover does not say what he is in disagreement about with any of my claims regarding the Lake Ontario Ordnance Works. It's difficult to defend oneself when the accuser won't say what it is that may be incorrect. I'm not worried about my credability. Pretty much all that as been published has been proven correct, and there's more to come.



Throw me a pitch Mr. Hoover, I'm looking to bat a 1000 this year, and I'm sure I can hit anything you send right over the outfield fence.



Cheers,

Louis Ricciuti

Los Alamos east--Niagara Falls Lewiston, NY

"It's not about the dose, it's about the truth."

BTW-Ray, the word is 'inappropriate' and not as you have spelled it  ;*)

But hey, what do I know?

"Before there was Los Alamos, there was LOOW"

Lake Ontario Ordnance Works 

Do you Yahoo!?

Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.