[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Errors in NRC TMI Factsheet





Norm Cohen passed along a farrago of mis-information.  I'll comment in an area I know quite a bit about:

-----Original Message-----

From:	Norm Cohen [mailto:ncohen12@comcast.net]

Sent:	Sat 3/6/2004 3:07 PM

To:	unplugsalem@yahoogroups.com; Know_Nukes@yahoogroups.com; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Cc:	

Subject:	Errors in NRC TMI Factsheet







What?s Wrong With the NRC?s 2004 Fact Sheet on the TMI Accident?

Published by

Three Mile Island Alert - March 2004



(NRC Fact sheet available at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/3mile-isle.html)



   <snip>



It was only by luck that the reactor walls were not breached. The industry

conjectured that voids in the coolant prevented molten fuel from burning

through the reactor walls. It is not known if these voids will form to 

prevent

a total meltdown in future accidents. Fifteen million curies of 

radiation is a

?massive quantity.?



    <snip>



===================



It was actually not luck, but a previously unanalyzed aspect of heat transfer during the accident.



As the molten core materials (corium) dropped into the lower reactor vessel head, it contacted the relatively cool lower RV head and froze.  The frozen corium was a mixture of metals and metal oxides (mostly metal oxides).  As such, it was a ceramic material and had a relatively low heat transfer coefficient.  The molten corium was enclosed in a "cup" of frozen corium.  The small flow of heat through the frozen corium was easily conducted to the outside of the lower RV head by the metal in the head (which has a high heat transfer conductivity).  This combination of low heat flow through the frozen corium and easier heat flow through the metal head kept the temperatures in the head low enough to prevent melting.



This previously unanalyzed phenomena is being incorporated into the design of next generation reactors as a passive safety feature.  It has been thoroughly analyzed by reactor vendors and others and accepted by the NRC during its review of the new designs.



Best regards.



Jim Dukelow

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Richland, WA

jim.dukelow@pnl.gov



These comments are mine and have not been reviewed and/or approved by my management or by the U.S. Department of Energy.



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/