[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Love Canal

To: Clayton.Bradt@Labor.State.Ny.Us, radsafe-digest@list.Vanderbilt.Edu
Subject: Re: Love Canal
From: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:41:53 EST
Reply-To: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM
Sender: owner-radsafe@list.Vanderbilt.Edu

Let's stay real.  The article I cited didn't say anything about cancers 

"existing," it said that essentially no excess cancers were observed.  The Standard 

Morbidity Ratio is a perfectly acceptable and well-understood epidemiological 

tool.  The difference between "no excess cancer" and "no cancer" should be 

crystal clear to anyone who is not engaged in deliberate distortion.



Ruth



RuthF. Weiner, Ph. D.

ruthweiner@aol.com

Prev by Date: Re: Taiwan, cobalt-60
Next by Date: Re: Love Canal reference from Weiner - Dapra is outdated
Prev by thread: Re: Love Canal
Next by thread: RE: Love Canal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread