[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NIOSH Reconstruction Western NY worthless
Dear sincere Radsafers:
Whom ever did the historic document search and dose reconstruction for
Bethlehem Steel in Lackawanna, New York, (yes, one in the same as the terrorists)
and other sites around Western New York, should be horse whipped, tarred then
feathered and run outta town on a rail. I am assuming that this "reconstruction"
was done by the MJW Corp and the folks who didn't have a clue about Union
Carbide's ElectroMetallurgical Works in Niagara Falls, NY. And YES Virginia,
E-Met was the free world's largest production center for Uranium metal-from ore
contrary to a previous (debate) that happened here last year with MJW
"officials".
I have reviewed the entire NIOSH report released last fall and have found
GAPING HOLES in it. Inaccuracies and incomplete research seem to prevail--I guess
you have to do something to "earn" your $20 million. Isn't that correct Mr.
Dooley and company? Sorry for the name use, but I only call em as I see em!
Someone pass the butter please?
Anyone care to debate this NIOSH reversal?
Sincerely,
Louis Ricciuti
Niagara Falls Lewiston, NY
The Los Alamos east--Before there was Los Alamos, there was LOOW,
The Lake Ontario Ordnance Works
email me: NiagaraNet@aol.com
****
Agency reverses on N-workers' aid money
By DOUGLAS TURNER
News Washington Bureau Chief
3/23/2004
WASHINGTON - The federal government has reversed itself on aid eligibility
for Bethlehem Steel Corp. employees whose health suffered because they worked
on nuclear materials at the Lackawanna facility.
Payments of as much as $150,000 for hundreds of Western New Yorkers are at
stake.
A 2000 federal law offered compensation to those who worked on the weapons
program from 1949 to 1952.
But the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health said last
November that there was the potential that workers could have suffered harm
long
after the nuclear weapons-related work ceased at the site. This offered hope
to
hundreds of workers whose applications had been denied because they did not
work there between 1949 and 1952.
Monday, however, the agency said that it made an "error" in November.
An unsigned agency announcement said its November report will be corrected to
state, "Records pertaining to Bethlehem Steel, Lackawanna, indicate there is
little potential for significant residual contamination at the site after
weapons-related operations ended there in 1952.
"As a result of an inadvertent error, the report incorrectly said that a
potential for residual contamination existed after 1952. NIOSH regrets any
inconvenience that these changes to the report may cause."
Rep. Jack F. Quinn, R-Hamburg, responding to the latest finding, said,
"Hundreds of Bethlehem Steel workers and their families have relied on the
contents
of the (November) report to not only confront the reasons behind their
illnesses, but also to create hope that they may be compensated for their
illnesses."
Rep. Louise M. Slaughter, D-Fairport, said, "I cannot fathom how a mistake
this tragic was allowed to occur at a federal agency whose mission is to
assist
these harmed workers. NIOSH is making the unbelievable admission that it
screwed up a report that was over a year late to Congress and has been
sitting on
their Web site since last November."
Slaughter said she is calling on the agency to prove that the site was
cleaned up.
This may be difficult, however, because buildings where the work was
conducted were razed years ago.
The latest findings could undermine support for a bill introduced by Quinn to
extend federal compensation to claimants who were employed by the plant after
the nuclear weapons work was said to be finished.
Slaughter and Rep. Thomas M. Reynolds, R-Clarence, are co-sponsors of the
bill.
As of Sept. 30, the end of the last fiscal year, only 138 of the 907 claims
filed by former Bethlehem workers had been approved.