RE: Current Issue of BMJ

[alstonchris@netscape.net]

My original note was misleading.  The doses to the brain in the study cited were secondary to radiotherapy for cutaneous hemangioma, not from cranial CT.  Also, the original article is actually in the BMJ of 3 January.  The issue of 3 March contains responses to that paper, and you can easily hyperlink to it from those letters.  That, and my careless scanning of the various texts, was why I got lost.



Mea culpa

cja







alstonchris wrote:

>Folks

>You might be interested in the issue of 6 March.  There are articles, and notes, on topics like doctors' response to radiation incidents, and a possible link between childhood cranial CT and adult cognitive impairment.  Is it my imagination, or do the Brits publish these kinds of pieces more often than USA journals?  Go to: bmj.bmjjournals.com.





__________________________________________________________________

Introducing the New Netscape Internet Service. 

Only $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register



Netscape. Just the Net You Need. 



New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer

Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.

Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/