[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Vermont nuclear plant searching for missing fuel rods
In a message dated 22/4/04 5:30:48 pm, gpblackwood@HOTMAIL.COM writes:
> On average and to the best of my knowledge the spent fuel ponds have about
> 10 times more radioactivity than a reactor core and normally retain a large
> amount cesium 137 isotope, which contain somewhere from 15 to 40 million
> curies with a half life of about 30 years. Anyone please correct me if I am
> wrong. But hopefully this was lousy record keeping......
>
>
>
Given that the original article states that "One of the missing pieces is
about
the size of a pencil. The other piece is about the thickness of a pencil and
17 inches long." then this clearly can't be an accounting error. According
to one of my reference books BWR fuel comes as fuel bundles/assemblies
consisting of an array of fuel pins (earlier plants were 7 x 7 later plants were 8
x8) which are quite thin, approximately 1.25 cm in diameter, and have an active
length of at least 12 feet. So what the facility may have identified is that
there are two missing fragments of a fuel pin.
The level of activity remaining within the fuel after 25 years will depend on
the fuel history, time in the core and it's location and the operating
history of the plant (no. of effective full power days etc.) The only information
I could find easily was for a PWR spent fuel assembly (a 17 x 17 array) after
33,000 Mwd/MTU burnup. After 10 years the assembly will contain 4.0 E+05
Curies, and the surface dose rate will be 23,400 rem/hr. After 50 years the
assembly will contain 1.0 E+05 Curies and the surface dose rate will be 8,640
rem/hr.
So although the fragments are only part of one (?) pin from an assembly with
64 pins (given that there aren't any gaps for in core components) the contact
dose rate for the pieces will be significant.
Apologies in advance to any radsafe specialist out there if I have made any
errors in the above.
Regards,
Julian