[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shielding Material
Bob,
They use a lot of this line of alloy to make blocker trays for linear accelerators and radiation therapy simulators. They usually cast the blocks in Styrofoam molds and heat it in a big coffee urn. (most often used "cerrobend" or "cerrolow" ` 185 degree F. melt point for safety reasons.) Machines well if you don't let it get too hot. Not as nearly as "squishey" as plain lead.
Just a thought. ~4" stops 1meV. Don't know about plating though.
Available at McMaster-Carr (http://mcmaster.com) retailer.
Good Luck
Karl Smith
KSmith@KnoRad.com
804-749-4381
Cerrobase: Melting point is 255° F. Composition is 55.5 percent Bismuth, 44.5 percent Lead.
JOHN.RICH@sargentlundy.com wrote:
I looked at some of the composite materials a while back, and
pound-for-pound lead was still the more efficient gamma shield.
TRANSCO and DUFRANE make "encased" lead shields that have structural
strength and enough interior lead to be efficient shields.
They can be encased in 'most any alloy you want. I don't know how small
the shields can be made but it might be worth your while to talk to one of
them.
john rich
john.rich@sargentlundy.com
"Bob Westerdale"
.com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Shielding Material
owner-radsafe@list.van
derbilt.edu
05/12/04 11:06 AM
Please respond to "Bob
Westerdale"
Greetings...
I've been asked to recommend an alloy for use in the construction of a port
cover for a 400 kV Electron Microscope ( TEM). I usually work with low kV
systems ( ie < 30 kV) where material is much less a factor; This high kV
Instrument presents a challenge in that:
1. The part will be cut from a cube about 5" X 5" x 5", with a
number of high precision machined features, so that machinability is a
serious concern
2. I'd like to be able to plate the part ( Cu-Ni-Cr) for aesthetics
3. I need an alloy with the best beam stopping capability I can
find.
4. I cannot make the whole part out of Pb, as there are some
structural loads that would not be well served by a mushy material. ( and
plating would nearly impossible.)
We've made similar parts in the past out of Leaded brass ( e.g. clock brass
or marine brass) and in some cases 303 or 304 Stainless, I'm hoping that
there might be some more modern materials ( ie tungsten/tantalum or ?
alloys...) that might allow for a less massive solution. Space
is at a premium, and I'd like to avoid a prolonged search for '
Unobtanium '
This component will be headed for Germany, interesting to note that we
cannot allow any exposed Pb surfaces, for fear of toxicity, and the
Radiation leakage at 2" must be less than .1 mR/Hr. (The end-user who told
me this was chain smoking unfiltered Rothmans in a tiny, unventilated
room..... so much for risk perception!)
If anyone has any suggestions/experience I'd be quite grateful!
Thanks,
Bob Westerdale
EDAX Inc.
Mahwah, NJ.
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/