[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: IP Takeover?
Saying that "LNG is at least as heavily a regulated industry as is the NP
industry" seems to me to gloss over some pretty obvious technical aspects.
But the solution to any discrepancies seems simple : the LNG regulations
merely need to be modified slightly to make sure that all storage facilities
and transport ships are constructed with three-foot thick, steel-reinforced,
convex-shaped walls with a radius no greater than about 20 meters per
installation.
For that matter, the same type of design requirement should be applied to
the high-rise buildings planned for the WTC site, and any other place where
thousands of people congregate, such as stadiums, cruise ships, etc..
Of course that's only if you're really concerned about public safety, not
just about scare mongering the public about nuclear power.
Jaro
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
[mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu]On Behalf Of Stewart Farber
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 2:33 PM
To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu; LNMolino@AOL.COM
Subject: Re: IP Takeover?
Hi all:
Since the politician who is proposing replacing IP's nukes with 2,000 MW[e]
of natural gas generating
capacity, and natural gas fired electric generating plants will force the
imporating of huge quantities of
LNG most likely, my comment is completely appropriate. True the LNG industry
is regulated, but does anyone
really think that LNG storage tanks or the huge incoming LNG tankers are
less subject to successful
terrorist attack which might lead to horrible consequences than an attack on
a NPP? Valid issues, valid
questions?
I'm not attacking the LNG industry just trying to put all the facts on the
table for honest evaluation of
risks, benefits, and costs to society.
Stewart Farber, MS Public Health
===============
5/26/04 12:59:35 PM, LNMolino@AOL.COM wrote:
>"Perhaps he thinks docking LNG supertankers and the nearby storage tanks
will make people feel safer than
the operation of IP's nuclear plants."
>
>The LNG Industry is fighting the SAME types of enviro groups that the NP
industry deals with. In some
cases the SAME people even. So why does a comment like this need to be made?
LNG is at least as heavily a
regulated industry as is the NP industry and dare I say as misunderstood as
far as risk is concerned.
>
>--
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/