Re: [Fwd: [graffis-l] Plutonium cancer risk may be higher than thought]

["Dr. Khalid Aleissa" <kaleissa@kacst.edu.sa>]

Just kidding! any amount of Pu is risky as long as it is less than

critical mass, then the risk will be different and involves more

parties.



sjd@swcp.com wrote:

> 

> July 18

> 

> I thought that DDT, PCBs, Alar, asbestos, lead, and mercury were the most

> substances known to man.

> 

> Seriously, what is the body burden of Pu in reference man in curie units and

> in atoms?  Perhaps we can all calculate the date of our death.  (Just

> kidding.  I'm not being morbid.)

> 

> Steven Dapra

> sjd@swcp.com

> 

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

> unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

> text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

> with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

> http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/



-- 

Khalid Aleissa, Ph.D.

AERI-KACSTP. O. Box 6086

Riyadh 11442

Saudi Arabia

Tel  (+9661) 481-3617

Fax. (+9661) 481-3887

e-mail: kaleissa@kacst.edu.sa



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/