RE: Popular Mechanics August Issue - H-bombs and Cold Fusion

["Flanigan, Floyd" <Floyd.Flanigan@nmcco.com>]

I think the folks at Popular Mechanics are keying in on certain words and drawing inacurate conclusions.



 Brigham Young University and the National Cold Fusion Institute at the University of Utah, the University of California at Santa Barbara, Case Western Reserve University, University of Florida, University of Minnesota, the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Los Alamos Laboratory, and EPRI (connected with Stanford University, Stanford Research Institute International and Texas A & M) are among those who conducted their own experiments in cold fusion. John Bockis at Texas A & M's Department of Chemistry and the Cyclotron Center established over ten cells and reported the production of tritium from D2O electrolysis at a palladium cathode, with the maximum tritium count observed in one cell as 4.9 x 10E6 disintegrations per minute per milliliter, showing 100 to 100,000 times more than that expected from the normal isotropic enrichment from electrolysis.



My thought is that Pop Mech may have an issue with confusing the meaning of enrichment due to context.



Floyd W. Flanigan B.S.Nuc.H.P.



-----Original Message-----

From: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

[mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Leavey

Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:06 AM

To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Subject: Popular Mechanics August Issue - H-bombs and Cold Fusion













The August issue of Pop Mechanics has a rather sensationalistic cover

proclaiming that cold fusion "enables anyone to build a nuke from commonly

available materials".  The article inside, however, spends most of it's

words mashing several somewhat related topics together: low DOE stockpiles

of tritium, a process called TCAP for separating H-1 and H-2, a positive

history of Fleischmann and Pons, and the deaths of two people at SRI from

exploding experiments and of Gene Mallove, founder of the New Energy

Foundation and proponent of cold fusion, who died 4 days after the

interview, apparently from a robbery. The article also says the DOE has

quietly re-opened cold fusion as a source of H-3 as a backup to TCAP and

Savannah River; the explanation is a bit lacking in the article.



The article then ends with an overview of U separation processes and

finally with the statements:   "that scores of cold fusion experiments have

revealed the production of enriched uranium, plutonium and tritium. If, as

much of this research suggests, cold fusion can be used to produce

weapons-grade materials...."  Can someone please explain how cold fusion

can enrich U and Pu?  The article has no references and sites several

sources that can't be checked (the Pop Mech web site didn't have any

additional info or references I could find).



Overall, IMHO, the article portrays cold fusion as a real energy generating

process that also enriches U and Pu while, as a bonus, making the H-3 you

need to grow your own H-bomb - right in your very own backyard!  Just what

we need now.....



Thanks,

Jeff

------------------------------------------------------------

Jeff Leavey, CHP

leaveyja@us.ibm.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/