RadSafe Archive Mail Index August, 2004

• Thread Index
• [RadSafe Home]
• [RadSafe Archives Search & Browse]

Listing format is the following:

• Subject (# of follow-ups) From
  

• Homeland Security and Radiation Prepared (0) Pauer, Thomas
  
• Pro-nuclear op-ed piece in Denver Post (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Popular Mechanics August Issue - H-bombs (0) Jeffrey Leavey
  
• 80% of A-bomb plaintiffs had acute radia (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Popular Mechanics August Issue - H-b (1) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Re: Popular Mechanics August Issue - H-b (2) bobcherry
  
• RE: Popular Mechanics August Issue - H-b (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: Popular Mechanics August Issue - H-b (0) Russ Johnson
  
• NPR Rad Story (1) alstonchris
  
• Re:RE: Popular Mechanics August Issue - (0) Mccormick, Luke I
  
• Re: NPR Rad Story (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Popular Mechanics August Issue - H-b (1) daleboyce
  
• The day the sky exploded (0) mark.ramsay
  
• Re: Popular Mechanics August Issue - H-b (0) Bernard Cohen
  
• RE: Popular Mechanics August Issue - H-b (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• smoke detector activity (3) Brian Rees
  
• Re: smoke detector activity (0) Mitchell Davis
  
• Looking for neutron source 10^6 n/s (Pu- (0) Felipe Gaitan
  
• Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation dose (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• NE Technology Electra (0) Mark Ramsay
  
• Re: smoke detector activity (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• The Radiological Accident in Cochabamba, (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Electric Personal Dosimetry vs. TLD (0) Carlos A. Correa
  
• HPS Plenary Speaker Evaluates ICRP Propo (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Fed Ex Shipment (0) Westin, Shari C.
  
• Automatic response to your mail (0) Jim Rolph
  
• Re: smoke detector activity (0) Urciuolo, Louis
  
• Re: Fed Ex Shipment (0) Roy A. Parker
  
• Re: Fed Ex Shipment (1) Russ Johnson
  
• LLRW and MLRW disposal in hospitals, lab (0) Dana Gordon-IICH
  
• RE: Fed Ex Shipment (0) Dana Gordon-IICH
  
• Gov't to End Public Nuclear Updates (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: smoke detector activity (1) Khalid Aleissa
  
• RE: Fed Ex Shipment (3) Rick Orthen
  
• RE: Fed Ex Shipment (0) John Jacobus
  
• Article: Is undocumented uranium coming (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: The Radiological Accident in Cochaba (0) ANDERSON Linda\(L\) - BRUCE POWER
  
• Los Alamos to Get Back to Work in Two Mo (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Fed Ex Shipment (2) Roy A. Parker
  
• FedEx Ground RAM Shipments (0) Roy A. Parker
  
• Re: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation do (0) JGinniver
  
• RE: Fed Ex Shipment (0) Somerville, Mark
  
• Replacement for RTGs in space exploratio (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Fed Ex Shipment (0) Russ Johnson
  
• APPROVE radsafe (0) Majordomo
  
• RE: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation do (3) Vernig, Peter G.
  
• Article casts doubt on interpretation of (0) Philip Egidi
  
• RE: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation do (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Fed Ex Shipment (0) Rick Orthen
  
• RE: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation do (0) Flood, John
  
• RE: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation do (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation do (1) Vernig, Peter G.
  
• AP corrects Nuclear Security Reporting S (0) Sandy Perle
  
• sodium iodide scintillation detectors (0) Dave Oshlo
  
• Re: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation do (1) Russ Johnson
  
• Canberra DiNeutron meter (0) Goff, Tom
  
• Re: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation do (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Fed Ex Shipment (0) Michael McCarty
  
• Re: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation do (0) Syd H. Levine
  
• Re: Fed Ex Shipment (0) Syd H. Levine
  
• RE: Fed Ex Shipment (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• RE: Fed Ex Shipment (0) alstonchris
  
• Re: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation do (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• Re: sodium iodide scintillation detector (1) John_Sukosky
  
• Re: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation do (0) joseph.greco
  
• Re: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation do (0) Gerald Nicholls
  
• U of Illionois News Release - research R (0) Boing, Lawrence E.
  
• Faster radiographic film (0) Gibbs, S Julian
  
• Gov't to End Public Nuclear Updates (0) Sandy Perle
  
• For Global Dosimetry customers that use (1) Vernig, Peter G.
  
• Re: For Global Dosimetry customers that (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: smoke detector activity (0) Syd H. Levine
  
• Re: sodium iodide scintillation detector (2) Syd H. Levine
  
• RE: Global Dosimetry and Handbook (0) Vernig, Peter G.
  
• Re: sodium iodide scintillation detector (2) James Barnes
  
• Re: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation do (0) JGinniver
  
• STRONG BUY: (UDVE) MAJOR PRICE APPRECIAT (0) Ariel Katz
  
• Re: sodium iodide scintillation detector (0) Syd H. Levine
  
• Re: X-ray/digital/radiation dose (0) osuleiman
  
• Ref: Digital Radiography (0) Shawn Hughes (Road)
  
• Re: Fed Ex Shipment (0) Gv1
  
• Re: Fed Ex Shipment (0) Gv1
  
• work stoppage at Los Alamos National Lab (0) Jaro
  
• ANTI-RADIATION PILLS (Iodine) (1) maury
  
• 4 Deaths at Japan nuclear plant (0) Rick Orthen
  
• (AP) Leak at Japan Nuclear Plant Kills F (1) Strickert, Rick
  
• Re: ANTI-RADIATION PILLS (Iodine) (0) Russ Johnson
  
• Re: LLRW and MLRW disposal in hospitals, (0) JDNUKE52
  
• Spreadsheet Version of NUREG/CR-6345 "Ra (0) Mike Bohan
  
• Re: (AP) Leak at Japan Nuclear Plant Kil (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: sodium iodide scintillation detector (1) Frank Bloe
  
• Re: sodium iodide scintillation detector (1) Syd H. Levine
  
• Re: sodium iodide scintillation detector (0) Raymond A Hoover
  
• Large containers for activated metals (0) Le, Quang
  
• FFTF Sodium Drain (0) Rick Orthen
  
• Employment opportunity (0) Markus Spivak
  
• Parts of zombie movie to be shot at Cher (0) John Jacobus
  
• No Subject (0) Mccormick, Luke I
  
• Non-Specialized cell (2) Moore,Paul
  
• BBC article on Radiation (1) Joel Baumbaugh
  
• Political "science"? (0) J. Marshall Reber
  
• BBC News Article (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Non-Specialized cell (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: BBC article on Radiation (0) John Jacobus
  
• ALI for RB-82 (0) Aro, Jon
  
• Re: Non-Specialized cell (1) Russ Johnson
  
• Re: Non-Specialized cell (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: U of Illionois News Release - resear (1) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• NUREG/CR-0130 (0) Leon Brown
  
• Re: Non-Specialized cell (0) John Jacobus
  
• Article: U.S. FDA OKs drugs to counter r (1) Jim Hardeman
  
• RE: U of Illionois News Release - resear (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Article: U.S. FDA OKs drugs to count (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Non-Specialized cell (1) Susan McElrath
  
• Re: Non-Specialized cell (0) John Jacobus
  
• K-40 in Coral (1) fbronson
  
• RE: U of Illionois News Release - resear (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Re: Article: U.S. FDA OKs drugs to count (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Article: U.S. FDA OKs drugs to count (0) John Jacobus
  
• AW: K-40 in Coral (0) Franz Sch�nhofer
  
• Errata Sheets for Handbook of HP and Rad (0) Peter.Vernig
  
• Re: BBC article on Radiation (1) John Jacobus
  
• BBC Article: Low level radiation 'no dan (0) Brooks, Michael
  
• Re: BBC article on Radiation (0) Russ Johnson
  
• Pressurized ion chamber, pressurized wit (0) Ramanuja, Jaya K
  
• Licensing Radioactive Material Offshore (2) rob.w.powell
  
• Re: Non-Specialized cell (0) alstonchris
  
• RE: Licensing Radioactive Material Offsh (0) Wilson Robert H PSNS
  
• State of the Radiation Safety Art (1950 (1) james.g.barnes
  
• Yucca Mountain : interview with Robert K (1) Jaro
  
• Re: Yucca Mountain : interview with Robe (0) Stewart Farber
  
• Re: Licensing Radioactive Material Offsh (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Yucca Mountain : interview with Robe (0) John_Rich
  
• RE: Licensing Radioactive Material Offsh (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: Licensing Radioactive Material Offsh (1) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: State of the Radiation Safety Art (1 (0) Howard Long
  
• Re: Licensing Radioactive Material Offsh (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: State of the Radiation Safety Art (1 (2) Joel T. Baumbaugh
  
• Re: Licensing Radioactive Material Offsh (1) Syd H. Levine
  
• AW: Licensing Radioactive Material Offsh (0) Franz Sch�nhofer
  
• Re: State of the Radiation Safety Art (1 (0) John Jacobus
  
• Po&Pb vs. Ra&Rn activity in Water (0) Dr. Khalid Aleissa
  
• Po&Pb vs. Ra&Rn activity in Water (1) Dr. Khalid Aleissa
  
• Re: Licensing Radioactive Material Offsh (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Po&Pb vs. Ra&Rn activity in Water (0) John Jacobus
  
• FW: Yucca Mountain : interview with Robe (0) Burkett, David Wayne
  
• Radioactive Material Rules in Jamaica (3) Jim Blute
  
• Re: Yucca Mountain : interview with Robe (0) Philip Egidi
  
• Job Posting (0) Church, Warren
  
• RE: Radioactive Material Rules in Jamaic (0) Graben, Tena A.
  
• Radioactive waste (0) Bernard Cohen
  
• Re: Radioactive Material Rules in Jamaic (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Radioactive Material Rules in Jamaic (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: Radioactive Material Rules in Jamaic (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: State of the Radiation Safety Art (1 (0) Mike Bohan
  
• FW: searching for picture at HPS-49 meet (0) Sun, Lin-Shen
  
• FedEx Express Embargos Connecticut Yello (0) Roy A. Parker
  
• Re: Testing capability (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Radon gas standard wanted (0) Harry J. Newman, CHP
  
• Fwd: Static MDC FormulaFwd: Static MDC (1) Radconpro
  
• RE: Static MDC Formula (0) bobcherry
  
• Re: State of the Radiation Safety Art (1 (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Self-taught scientist created CAT scan (1) Jaro
  
• List problems (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Thrilling application of surplus DOE fun (0) maury
  
• Re: Thrilling application of surplus DOE (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Thrilling application of surplus DOE (0) maury
  
• Amchitka (2) maury
  
• Re: The Radiological Accident in Cochaba (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Self-taught scientist created CAT sc (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Amchitka (1) Michael McNaughton
  
• Re: The Radiological Accident in Cochaba (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Amchitka (0) John Jacobus
  
• Baldwin : "crushing ignorance in the Uni (2) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Baldwin : "crushing ignorance in the (0) Baratta, Edmond J
  
• Re: Baldwin : "crushing ignorance in the (0) Bill Prestwich
  
• Handbook of HP and Rad Health 3rd Ed (1) Vernig, Peter G.
  
• PG&E says can't find missing nuclear fue (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Decommissioning Plan for a Particle Acce (1) Boing, Lawrence E.
  
• Re: Handbook of HP and Rad Health 3rd Ed (0) Michael McNaughton
  
• Re: The Radiological Accident in Cochaba (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Baldwin : "crushing ignorance in the (1) bobcherry
  
• AW: Amchitka - waste of taxpayers money (2) Franz Sch�nhofer
  
• RE: Baldwin : "crushing ignorance in the (0) bobcherry
  
• Re: Baldwin : "crushing ignorance in the (0) Lorraine Marceau-Day
  
• Mangano urges new studies of TMI health (1) Norm Cohen
  
• AW: Baldwin : "crushing ignorance in the (0) Franz Sch�nhofer
  
• Bexxar Treatment (1) Danny K McClung
  
• NTI: Global Security Newswire - Wednesda (0) Stewart Farber
  
• Re: AW: Amchitka - waste of taxpayers mo (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: [Know_Nukes] Mangano urges new studi (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Bexxar Treatment (0) John Jacobus
  
• the Toronto cooling project (0) Jay Caplan
  
• Crystal Ball vs @Risk (1) Ralph E. Wild
  
• 241Am source wanted (0) Jeff Mellon
  
• RE: Amchitka (0) Timothy Hart
  
• Help (2) Yuri Ravello
  
• AW: Help (0) Franz Sch�nhofer
  
• Re: AW: Amchitka - waste of taxpayers mo (0) maury
  
• saftey of being in the proximity of some (1) Steve Packard
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) John Jacobus
  
• No Missing Data Found at Oak Ridge Natio (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Employment Opportunity (0) Ronald Reif
  
• Re: Help (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (2) Philip Egidi
  
• Re: Baldwin : "crushing ignorance in the (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (2) daleboyce
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (1) Neil, David M
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) Rogers Brent
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (2) daleboyce
  
• Resonant Nuclear batteries. Current s (0) Steve Packard
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (1) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) Stankewitsch, Brian T.
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) Philip Egidi
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) Peter Fear
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) Gerald Nicholls
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (1) Russ Johnson
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE:- Re: saftey of being in the proximit (2) Diane Griffiths
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (1) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• RE: safety of being in the proximity of (0) Peter.Vernig
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (1) Gerald Nicholls
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (1) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• RE:- Re: saftey of being in the proximit (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: - Re: saftey of being in the proximi (1) Diane Griffiths
  
• Re: - Re: saftey of being in the proximi (2) Russ Johnson
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) Gerald Nicholls
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) Stankewitsch, Brian T.
  
• Proximity? (0) jjcohen
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (1) J. Marshall Reber
  
• RE: - Re: saftey of being in the proximi (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) Scott Davidson
  
• Re: - Re: saftey of being in the proximi (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: - Re: saftey of being in the proximi (1) Rick Orthen
  
• RE: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) Rick Orthen
  
• Nuisance E-mails (0) McAllister, Kathleen (DPH)
  
• Re: - Re: saftey of being in the proximi (0) Russ Johnson
  
• Re: [Know_Nukes] Mangano urges new studi (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: [Know_Nukes] Mangano urges new studi (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• re: medical waste (1) Shawn Hughes (Road)
  
• RE: safety of being in the proximity of (0) Daniel Kane
  
• Agencies seek grand jury documents on fo (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: [Know_Nukes] Mangano urges new studi (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: [Know_Nukes] Mangano urges new studi (1) Stabin, Michael
  
• re: medical waste (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: [Know_Nukes] Mangano urges new studi (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: [Know_Nukes] Mangano urges new studi (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: medical waste (0) George J. Vargo
  
• RE: [Know_Nukes] Mangano urges new studi (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• RE: medical waste (1) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: medical waste (0) daleboyce
  
• Re: saftey of being in the proximity of (0) Tom Hazlett
  
• Fw: [OEM] A Videoconference on Health Ef (0) James Barnes
  
• Genetic Effects; Then and Now (0) James Barnes
  
• ICRP - Human Alimentary Tract Model for (0) Fred Dawson
  
• RE: Genetic Effects; Then and Now (1) james.g.barnes
  
• Sandy Perle - Change in mailing address (0) Sandy Perle
  
• NYT Editorial: Roadblock at Yucca Mounta (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Genetic Effects; Then and Now (1) Phil Rutherford
  
• Re: Genetic Effects; Then and Now (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: NYT Editorial: Roadblock at Yucca Mo (0) Rick Orthen
  
• Nuclear Waste Removed From Hanford Site (0) Sandy Perle
  
• October 2004 Health Physics Journal (0) BABusby
  
• Reuters: Brazil police seize black marke (0) LancerGT
  
• Vendor for respirators (0) John Jacobus
  
• Naturally Occurring Contaminants Confere (0) Susan Gawarecki
  
• RE: Vendor for respirators (0) alstonchris
  
• Re: Genetic Effects; Then and Now (0) garyi
  
• RE: Genetic Effects; Then and Now (0) garyi
  
• Re: Vendor for respirators (0) joseph.greco
  
• RE: Vendor for respirators (0) Eby, Jerald L
  
• Seeking background data on cinder block (0) Tony Mason
  
• Seeking background data on cinder block (0) Tony Mason
  
• Self-shielded Irradiator (0) Jeremy Hawk
  
• RE: Seeking background data on cinder bl (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• RE: Seeking background data on cinder bl (0) Boing, Lawrence E.
  
• Re:Seeking background data on cinder blo (0) Mccormick, Luke I
  
• Re: seeking cinder block background data (0) Tony Mason
  
• Background radiation levels (3) APasConslt
  
• AW: Background radiation levels (0) Franz Sch�nhofer
  
• RE: Background radiation levels (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Re: Background radiation levels (0) Paul_Prichard
  
• Re: Background radiation levels (0) Philip Egidi
  
• Converting to the metric system inch by (0) Strom, Daniel J
  
• RE: seeking cinder block background data (0) Falo, Gerald A Dr KADIX
  
• RE: Background radiation levels (0) Falo, Gerald A Dr KADIX
  
• RE: Background radiation levels in U.S. (0) Jim Otton
  
• Re: Background radiation levels (0) john cameron
  
• Re:Background radiation levels (0) Mccormick, Luke I
  
• Yucca Mountain Mudslide: Both Sides Diss (0) Susan Gawarecki
  
• request for help with Wikipedia article (1) Nathan Russell
  
• Re: request for help with Wikipedia arti (1) Michael McNaughton
  
• Re: request for help with Wikipedia arti (3) Nathan Russell
  
• RE: Vendor for respirators (0) alstonchris
  
• Re: request for help with Wikipedia arti (1) Michael McNaughton
  
• Computing Radiation Dosimetry - Proceedi (0) SARTORI Enrico
  
• AW: request for help with Wikipedia arti (1) Franz Sch�nhofer
  
• Manifolding Laboratory Hood Ducts (0) Petlick, Scott
  
• RE: request for help with Wikipedia arti (0) Riely, Brian P.
  
• RE: request for help with Wikipedia arti (0) Bradshaw, Keith
  
• Computing Radiation Dosimetry - Proceedi (0) SARTORI Enrico
  
• Re: AW: request for help with Wikipedia (0) John Sebastian
  
• C-14 production in reactors (0) daleboyce
  
• Re: request for help with Wikipedia arti (0) JGinniver
  
• Re: AW: request for help with Wikipedia (1) Michael McNaughton
  
• Re: AW: request for help with Wikipedia (1) Nathan Russell
  
• Re: request for help with Wikipedia arti (1) Michael McNaughton
  
• C-14 production (1) daleboyce
  
• Energy production (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• AW: C-14 production (0) Franz Sch�nhofer
  
• Re: Phoenix reactor accident (0) John Jacobus
  
• Radiation Effects"Then" (1959) in ACR Mo (0) Orion1111
  
• Computing Radiation Dosimetry - Proceedi (0) SARTORI Enrico
  
• " Nuclear reactor not necessary for medi (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: H-3 production (follow up to C-14 pr (1) Morgan, Ben
  
• AW: AW: request for help with Wikipedia (0) Franz Sch�nhofer
  
• Tennessee Valley Authority Studies Addit (0) Sandy Perle
  
• request for help with Wikipedia article (0) Franz Sch�nhofer
  
• Re: " Nuclear reactor not necessary for (0) daleboyce
  
• RE: " Nuclear reactor not necessary for (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• RE: " Nuclear reactor not necessary for (0) Baratta, Edmond J
  
• AW: H-3 production (follow up to C-14 pr (0) Franz Sch�nhofer
  
• Re: " Nuclear reactor not necessary for (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: H-3 production (follow up to C-14 pr (0) JGinniver
  
• RE: " Nuclear reactor not necessary for (0) Baratta, Edmond J
  
• Stockholm Royal Palace Radon levels (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Radiometric forensics (1) E. van der Graaf
  
• AW: Stockholm Royal Palace Radon levels (0) Franz Sch�nhofer
  
• Operating Manuals for some Antiquated Ra (0) Tad Blanchard
  
• AW: Radiometric forensics (1) Franz Sch�nhofer
  
• Re: AW: Radiometric forensics (0) Raymond A Hoover