[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Kodak X-ray film lowers radiation dose
There is a lot to be said for digital pictures.
However, when "the 35mm scan has 14.6 * 3 pixels or
43.8 megapixels in digital camera equivalent pixels,"
there still a lot the can be said for film.
http://www.users.qwest.net/~rnclark/scandetail.htm#digicamres1
--- Russ Johnson <rujohnso@nmsu.edu> wrote:
> Filmless photography is the rage now, so why not
> filmless medical
> radiography? Kodak had better prepare or they will
> become obsolete. Our
> local hospital went with digital imaging a couple of
> years ago. Works
> fine. Only thing to keep in mind is that digital
> radiographic images
> might not be admissible as evidence in a court of
> law. I don't know if
> that one has come up yet or not. So, film will
> likely be around for a
> while longer, just for things like that.
> -Russ
>
> "Vernig, Peter G." wrote:
>
> > Film is passé and will probably soon be all but
> obsolete in this
> > country. Digital imaging is here now and we
> switched over a year ago
> > in radiology. One of our clinics uses it in their
> dental clinic we do
> > not as yet, matter of inertia and start up costs.
> But besides
> > reducing use of chemicals with toxic silver
> [that's right silver] and
> > attendant silver recovery it allows us to read
> studies from two of our
> > clinics here.My guess is Kodak is trying to retain
> as much business
> > for as long as possible by making whatever
> improvements it can.I
> > visited an orthopedist because my daughter had a
> problem [essentially
> > like having osteoporosis [sp?] in one bone in her
> foot because of poor
> > blood supply. The doctor was able to zoom,
> enlarge, rotate, and very
> > visually and explicitly show me the problem, or
> actually the
> > correction of the problem.It was way cool! And my
> daughter's foot is
> > OK too. Any opinions in this e-mail are solely
> those of the author,
> > and are not represented as those of the VA Eastern
> Colorado HCS, the
> > Dept. of Veterans Affairs, or the US Government.
> >
> > Peter G. Vernig, Radiation Safety Officer, VA
> Eastern Colorado Health
> > Care System, 1055 Clermont St. Denver, CO 80220,
> > peter.vernig@med.va.gov, Phone= 303.399.8020
> x2447; Fax =
> > 303.393.5026, alternate fax, 303.393.5248
> >
> > "...whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever
> is lovely, whatever
> > is admirable, if anything is found to be excellent
> or praiseworthy,
> > let your mind dwell on these things."
> >
> > Paul of Tarsus
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: JGinniver@AOL.COM
> [mailto:JGinniver@AOL.COM]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 9:33 AM
> > To: jim_hoerner@HOTMAIL.COM;
> radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
> > Subject: Re: Kodak X-ray film lowers
> radiation dose
> >
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 4/8/04 3:25:34 am,
> > jim_hoerner@HOTMAIL.COM writes:
> >
> >
> >
> > > [Makes one wonder if it's more expensive
> film, and if so,
> > > is it worth it?
> > > LNT in action, folks.
> >
> > I don't know whether there will be some
> increase in price
> > for this new film, but I have got the dentist
> who undertakes
> > work at our site to move from group D to
> Group E films which
> > reduces the dose by about half. I did check
> with his film
> > supplier and the cost was the same. In
> addition I checked
> > with Kodak and the Group E film used the
> same processing as
> > the Group D and so there was no additional
> cost for new
> > equipment, writing new procedures, staff
> training etc.
> >
> > A true example of ALARA, where it was
> entirely reasonable to
> > reduce doses by half.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Julian
> >
>
=====
+++++++++++++++++++
"We Americans have no commission from God to police the world"
Benjamin Harrison
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird@yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/