[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Gov't to End Public Nuclear Updates



Index:



Gov't to End Public Nuclear Updates  

Nuclear plant due for $706 million repair 

Gambling, shellfish and a nuclear reactor

Officials: California man scales fence at nuclear power station

========================



Gov't to End Public Nuclear Updates  



WASHINGTON - The government will no longer reveal security gaps 

discovered at nuclear power plants, hoping to prevent terrorists from 

using the information, regulators said Wednesday.  



The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced the change in policy 

during its first public meeting on power plant safety since the Sept. 

11, 2001, terrorist attacks.  



Until now, the NRC has provided regular public updates on 

vulnerabilities its inspectors found at the country's 103 nuclear 

power reactors, such as broken fences or weaknesses in training 

programs. 



"We need to blacken some of our processes so that our adversaries 

won't have that information," said Roy Zimmerman, director of the 

commission's Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, which 

was created after the attacks. 



NRC spokesman Scott Burnell said commissioners voted to take the step 

March 29, but kept it quiet as agency staff worked to implement the 

plan. The vote itself was revealed Wednesday. 



"We deliberated for many months on finding the balance between the 

NRC's commitment to openness and the concern that sensitive 

information might be misused by those who wish us harm," commission 

Chairman Nils Diaz said in a written statement. 



Protection at the nation's nuclear power reactors . located at 64 

sites in 31 states . has been ratcheted up since the Sept. 11 

attacks. The commission has long been guarded about revealing 

specifics of the security efforts. 



But that has not stopped accusations of inadequate guard training and 

other security lapses. 



Congressional investigations have found problems such as a guard 

falling asleep on the job and lost keys to sensitive areas. Reports 

from the Energy Department's inspector general noted other problems, 

such as guards being warned of upcoming security exercises and 

inconsistent training from site to site. 



Nuclear activists have expressed concern about the adequacy of guard 

training, fire protection, the security of pools containing spent 

nuclear fuel, and planning for different kinds of attacks. 



"The vulnerabilities at a lot of the reactors in this country have 

not been addressed," said Jim Riccio, a nuclear policy analyst for 

Greenpeace. "Here we are nearly three years from the attacks and I 

don't see anything they've done except extending the perimeters of 

these facilities." 



In the weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks, operators at the nation's 

nuclear power plants posted more guards, added security patrols and 

reduced access to the installations' most sensitive areas. 



Military planes at nearby bases stood ready to intercept any 

suspicious aircraft, the Coast Guard patrolled the Great Lakes near 

power plants to keep ships away, and many facilities enlisted the 

help of National Guard troops. 



Some critics have said nothing short of military occupation of the 

plants will provide adequate safety. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham 

(news - web sites) said in May that the possibility of creating a 

federal police force to guard nuclear plants was being seriously 

discussed. 



Paul Gunter, a nuclear expert at the watchdog group Nuclear 

Information and Resource Service, said he's worried that plants since 

1992 have been allowed to delay implementation of fire protection 

equipment for control room cables. 



"Our major concern is that the NRC really has to stop protecting the 

nuclear power industry from the cost of security and really start 

protecting it from the clear and present danger of terrorism," Gunter 

said.

-------------------



Nuclear plant due for $706 million repair 

David Lazarus 



Aug 4 (San Francisco Chronicle) PG&E, which reported a 64 percent 

increase in net income Tuesday, wants its customers to pay $706 

million -- and possibly more -- to overhaul the utility's Diablo 

Canyon nuclear power plant. 



State regulators will hold hearings on the utility's request next 

month. A decision could come by year's end. At stake is nothing less 

than California's energy future. 



PG&E says the money, which it would take in through an almost 2 

percent increase in monthly bills, is needed to replace Diablo 

Canyon's aging steam generators. They produce power from water heated 

by nuclear fission. 



The utility says this would keep Diablo Canyon operational for at 

least the next 20 years and thus provide juice for power-thirsty 

homes and businesses. Otherwise, PG&E says, it may have to close the 

plant as soon as 2013, creating the potential for a new energy 

crisis. 



"Diablo generates roughly 20 percent of the electricity that PG&E 

customers use," noted John Nelson, a spokesman for the utility. 



Opponents of the plan, including the Sierra Club and Greenpeace, say 

the hundreds of millions of dollars sought by PG&E could just as 

easily be spent on constructing state-of-the-art, non-nuclear power 

plants. 



They argue that diverting the money away from Diablo Canyon could 

represent the start of a far-reaching plan for statewide energy self- 

sufficiency based on a combination of natural-gas-fired plants and 

alternative energy sources. 



'Better uses for money' 



This approach, however, could end up costing almost twice the amount 

PG&E is seeking. 



"There are a lot better uses for the money PG&E wants," said Rochelle 

Becker of Mothers for Peace, an anti-nuclear watchdog group 

spearheading the opposition to the utility's plans. "Why should we 

just hand it over to them?" 



Pacific Gas and Electric Co. submitted its request for the funds in 

January as squabbling continued with regulators over the utility's 

bankruptcy proceedings. 



In its filing, PG&E asked the California Public Utilities Commission 

to approve passing along $706 million in Diablo Canyon maintenance 

charges to ratepayers. 



In the 1990s, the PUC required PG&E to cover such expenses on its 

own. But now, after regulatory changes, the utility can fund plant 

upgrades and maintenance through approved rate increases. 



Passing along such costs to ratepayers is common in the utility 

business and is how generators have been replaced at other nuclear 

plants nationwide. 



Yet PG&E also sought approval in January "to seek recovery in rates 

of any amounts above the CPUC-specified reasonable and prudent cost" 

for the replacement work, subject to a PUC "reasonableness review." 



"That's not normally how we do things around here," observed Truman 

Burns, a regulatory analyst in the PUC's Office of Ratepayer 

Advocates. "Normally the cost gets nailed down in advance." 



In April, Southern California Edison said $680 million will have to 

be spent within five years to replace generators at the San Onofre 

nuclear power plant it co-owns with San Diego Gas & Electric Co. 



San Onofre repairs 



The San Diego utility disputes whether the work is justified at this 

time, leaving it unclear who will pay for the repairs. Edison, which 

owns 75 percent of San Onofre, estimates the work would result in 

customers' monthly bills rising by about 2 percent. 



Numerous utilities, including Edison, sued a leading maker of steam 

generators, Westinghouse Electric Corp., in the 1980s and '90s for 

faulty equipment. Most of the suits were settled out of court. 



Diablo Canyon uses Westinghouse generators. But PG&E's Nelson said 

the equipment has met expectations and in fact has outlasted 

machinery at other nuclear plants. 



Referendum on the future 



Next month's hearings are intended to focus on whether the Diablo 

Canyon project offers ratepayers good value for money. But they're 

also shaping up to be a referendum on the plant's future. 



The 2,200-megawatt coastal facility near San Luis Obispo generates 

enough power to light more than 2 million homes. 



If the steam generators are replaced as per PG&E's wishes, the plant 

is licensed to remain operational until 2025. PG&E is already 

studying whether to seek an extension of that license. 



Critics point to the potential danger of having a nuclear plant 

several miles from an earthquake fault. They observe that PG&E says 

it will store nuclear waste -- spent fuel rods -- on a nearby 

hillside because there's nowhere else to put it. 



Similarly, the utility says it would also store Diablo Canyon's old 

generators in concrete structures on a hillside above the plant if 

regulators OK the replacement work. Each of the eight generators is 

68 feet tall and weighs 800,000 pounds. 



Each will remain radioactive for at least 25 years after being shut 

down. 



"This plant was designed in 1960," said Becker of Mothers for Peace. 

"How many of us would want to drive cars designed in 1960?" 



Environmentally friendly 



Rather than pumping more money into Diablo Canyon, she said, 

California should construct environmentally friendly plants to 

address the state's energy needs. 



A 1,054-megawatt gas-fired plant now being constructed by Southern 

California Edison in San Bernardino County is budgeted at about $650 

million. 



To replace Diablo Canyon, therefore, two such plants would need to be 

built at a cost of nearly $1.3 billion. 



New plants last longer 



According to Becker, they'd be worth every penny. 



"You'd have brand new power plants that last decades longer than 

Diablo Canyon, and you wouldn't be producing radioactive waste on the 

earthquake- prone coast of California," she said. "That's the best 

use of our money." 

-----------------



Gambling, shellfish and a nuclear reactor

Survival and development on ancestral homelands



LACROSSE, Wis. Aug 3 (Jim Seida / MSNBC) - The Mississippi River has 

as many stories as it does bends, and they come at you quicker than a 

speedboat bearing down on a raft when you.re trying to race from 

headwaters to mouth in just two weeks. On Day 2, we were the common 

thread between two disparate story lines spinning out on the same 

stretch of river . a Native American tribe that.s trying to 

capitalize on its good fortune and an environmental success story 

that is returning a long-absent native mussel to parts of the upper 

river.



We started our day on the southern outskirts of Minneapolis and drove 

about 60 miles southeast to the Prairie Island Indian Community . the 

only tribal reservation bordering the Mississippi River. 



Like every other native American tribe in the Midwest, the 650-member 

Prairie Island tribe was forced from its ancestral homelands along 

the river, its members scattered throughout the West after a brief 

but bloody revolt known as the Dakota Conflict in 1862. But unlike 

the others, the Prairie Island community reclaimed a 534-acre piece 

of its ancestral land about 10 miles south of Red Wing, a sandy 

island bordered by the Mississippi and the Vermillion rivers. 



The tribe also holds a more dubious distinction . its residents 

apparently are the closest neighbors of a nuclear plant in the United 

States, with some homes just 600 yards from the twin-tower Prairie 

Island nuclear power plant owned by Xcel Energy.



The story of the Prairie Island Indians is one of perseverance. The 

tribe.s members began trickling back to the island in the late 1880s 

and eventually attained the critical mass that led to federal 

recognition of the tribe in 1936.



But with only subsistence farming and few local jobs, poverty 

remained a way of life for the tribe -- made up mostly of Mdewakanton 

Dakota Indians, or .those who were born of the waters. -- until well 

into the 1960s.



.My grandparents had absolutely nothing, it was abject poverty at 

that time,. said Doreen Hagen, president of the Prairie Island Tribal 

Council.



But many of the tribe.s elders remember those years fondly.



Pauline Hamilton, a 78-year-old great-grandmother who grew up on the 

reservation, says the casino has been a double-edged sword: "Years 

ago there was caring and sharing with one another. That's in the past 

now."  



.People helped each other,. said Pauline Hamilton, a 78-year-old 

great-grandmother whose parents performed for a time in .Wild Bill. 

Hickock.s Wild West show. .I don.t ever remember going hungry. There 

was a lot of game and fish. The men worked for the local farmers . 

(in exchange for) milk and eggs and a few dollars.. 



That began to change in 1984, when the tribe opened a bingo hall on 

the island and began attracting a trickle of residents from Red Wing 

and beyond. The trickle became a torrent in 1988, when the hall was 

expanded to become the casino-style gambling at what is now known as 

the Treasure Island Resort and Casino. 



The casino has enabled the tribe to make much needed improvements to 

the infrastructure, paving roads, building a school and a health 

clinic staffed by doctors from the Mayo Clinic and creating a tribal 

police force. 



It also has led to .per capita. payments . excess revenue that is 

sent each month to tribe members. Prairie Island officials won.t say 

how much each member receives, but a drive around the reservation 

reveals new high-end vehicles in almost every driveway.



While the money has given tribe members new opportunities, Hagen said 

that the biggest benefit has been to give the tribe clout with state 

and federal leaders for the first time.



.The casino has made it possible for us to travel to D.C. and see the 

representatives, and we also have lobbyists in D.C. and here in the 

state to help us with our issues now as well,. she said.



That influence was sorely lacking when the Prairie Island nuclear 

plant was built in 1968. 



Hagen said that tribe members were first told that the facility would 

be a coal-powered plant that would bring jobs to the impoverished 

locals. Only later did they find out that the plant was a nuclear 

reactor, and the jobs never materialized, she said.



Nor has the plant been a good neighbor in the intervening years, 

Hagen said. In one instance, there was an accident that resulted in 

an evacuation of the plant, but the tribe was never alerted, she 

said.



.The reason we found out was that all the cars were leaving,. she 

said. .Everyone was leaving and they forgot to tell us. Luckily we 

had a person who worked there who called and said, .You better get 

out...



The presence of the plant remains a major concern, both because there 

are 17 concrete .casks. with spent nuclear fuel rods stored on the 

grounds awaiting development of a permanent federal disposal site and 

because tribe members fear it could be a target for a Sept. 11 style 

terrorist attack.



A spokeswoman for the Nuclear Management Co. of Hudson, Wis., which 

operates the plant for Xcel, had no immediate comment on Hagen.s 

comments.



Despite continuing concern over the potentially dangerous neighbor, 

the most controvercial topic lately has been the tribe.s lucrative 

casino.



Hamilton, the tribal elder, said that some members of the tribe 

believe that the easy money is undermining the community.s cultural 

identity.



.Years ago there was caring and sharing with one another,. she said. 

.That.s in the past now. I don.t know what the future is, you know?.



But Hagen said the benefits of the casino far outweigh the minuses.



.We like to concentrate on the positive parts,. she said. .There are 

a few negative things, but nothing that we can.t overcome because we 

have the resources to do that..



The 'keystone species'

Less than a mile upriver from the tribe.s new marina, river ecologist 

Mike Davis and two assistants are working to cement an environmental 

success story by reintroducing the Higgins. eye mussel to a stretch 

of water where it has not been seen since the 1930s.

 

While the disappearance of a particular variety of mussel from the 

river might not seem a big loss, Davis said that the shellfish are a 

.keystone species. that are an important contributor to a river.s 

health.



.They become extremely abundant over time and they bury themselves 

into the sediment and become substrata of the riverbed, stabilizing 

the river and providing roughness that can be colonized by algae and 

aquatic insects that eat the algae, and then smaller fish that feed 

on those insects, and then of course the bigger fish,. he said. .. It 

creates this sort of positive feedback loop in the ecosystem..

 

On this day, Davis, who works for the Minnesota Department of Natural 

Resources, and two crewmembers . Becky Hochstein, a student intern 

studying biology at St. Olaf College in Northfield, Minn., and Dan 

Allen, a former intern who is back for another summer on the river . 

are literally crawling around the bottom of the river in scuba gear, 

sifting the ooze with their bare hands in search of any and all 

mussels. The object of the search is to find out which other types of 

mussels are present to determine whether this is prime real estate 

for the Higgins. eye as well.



The dive point in the Buffalo Slough, which runs parallel to the main 

channel of the Mississippi, turns out to be a mussel gold mine. In 

about 20 minutes of diving, Hochstein and Allen pull up bags laden 

with 11 species of the shellfish, known by exotic but unofficial 

names like the pink heel-splitter, round pig toe, pocketbook and 

pimple back.



That leads Davis, a weathered 55-year-old former commercial 

fisherman, to mark the site as a likely spot to plant Higgins. eye 

mussels that he and his team are hatching using a technique perfected 

during the days when buttons were big industry on the river. 

 

The project, which is funded primarily by the U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers but has drawn participation from numerous state and federal 

agencies, aims to establish new colonies of the Higgins. eye mussel 

in the upper Mississippi to hedge against the invasive non-native 

zebra mussel. The zebra mussel, which grows so thickly on the river 

bottom that it .smothers. Higgins. eye mussels, already has spread as 

far north as Pepin Lake, only a few miles below where Davis and his 

crew are working.



Last year, the project placed 500 Higgins. eye mussels in the upper 

river, and that number is due to grow to 1,500 this year and 7,500 

next year, Davis said. So far, initial checks on the mussels planted 

last year are promising.



.They.re reproducing, whether they establish a self-sustaining 

community remains to be seen,. he said.

------------------



Officials: California man scales fence at nuclear power station



Aug 3 (AP) SHIPPINGPORT, Pa. Officials say a man who scaled an eight-

foot-high security fence at the Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Station 

told police he didn't know he had been trespassing.



Security officers caught 40-year-old Modesto, California, resident 

Craig Billington shortly after he scaled the fence at the nuclear 

facility Monday.



A spokesman for plant owner FirstEnergy Corporation says Billington 

didn't have any weapons or threatening items. The spokesman says it 

looks like Billington was in the middle of a cross-country trip and 

the fence got in the way.



Billington faces charges of criminal trespass and disorderly conduct. 

He was sent to the Beaver County Jail.



------------------------------------

Sandy Perle

Senior Vice President, Technical Operations

Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.

3300 Hyland Avenue

Costa Mesa, CA 92626



Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100  Extension 2306

Fax:(714) 668-3149



E-Mail: sperle@dosimetry.com

E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net



Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/

Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/