[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Surface Contaminated Objects



Afraid not.  Check out Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 16, pages 3656, 3670

and 3671.



Randy Redmond

Radiological Control Organization

BWXT Y-12 L.L.C.

Oak Ridge, TN

865-574-5640







> -----Original Message-----

> From:	Rick Orthen [SMTP:rorthen@cecinc.com]

> Sent:	Tuesday, September 21, 2004 12:10 PM

> To:	'Redmond, Randy (RXQ)'; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

> Cc:	'Oliver, Bobby (OLV)'; 'Wical, Scott Andrew (S3W)'

> Subject:	RE: Surface Contaminated Objects

> 

> Randy--Relax.  The 49CFR174.403 "definition" limits you state are

> erroneous;

> see 173.443 for the correct values [4 Bq/cm2 (22,000 dpm/100 cm2)

> beta/gamma; 0.4 Bq/cm2 (2,200 dpm/100 cm2) alpha].

> 

> Rick

> 

> Richard F. Orthen, CHMM

> Senior Project Manager

> Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

> Four Triangle Lane, Suite 200

> Export, PA  15632-9255

> 724/327-5200, ext. 231

> www.cecinc.com

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/