[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Surface Contaminated Objects
Afraid not. Check out Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 16, pages 3656, 3670
and 3671.
Randy Redmond
Radiological Control Organization
BWXT Y-12 L.L.C.
Oak Ridge, TN
865-574-5640
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Orthen [SMTP:rorthen@cecinc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 12:10 PM
> To: 'Redmond, Randy (RXQ)'; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
> Cc: 'Oliver, Bobby (OLV)'; 'Wical, Scott Andrew (S3W)'
> Subject: RE: Surface Contaminated Objects
>
> Randy--Relax. The 49CFR174.403 "definition" limits you state are
> erroneous;
> see 173.443 for the correct values [4 Bq/cm2 (22,000 dpm/100 cm2)
> beta/gamma; 0.4 Bq/cm2 (2,200 dpm/100 cm2) alpha].
>
> Rick
>
> Richard F. Orthen, CHMM
> Senior Project Manager
> Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
> Four Triangle Lane, Suite 200
> Export, PA 15632-9255
> 724/327-5200, ext. 231
> www.cecinc.com
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/