[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Non Ionizing Rad Question



There's another company called Shielding Dynamics that can do such 

shielding.  If you want contact info let me know and I will dig a bit for it.



Its always very expensive to shield for RF or MRI fields, so you might 

want to verify the measurement, as someone else suggested.



-Gary Isenhower



On 2 Nov 2004 at 17:02, joseph.greco@kodak.com 

<joseph.greco@kodak.com> wrote:



> 

> Russ - the 5 Gauss limit comes from the American Conference of

> Governmental Industrial Hygienists guideline for persons with

> pacemakers and similar implanted medical devices.   The 2004 TLV

> (Threshold Limit Value) from the ACGIH for an 8-hr time weighted

> average is actually 600 G for the working population.

> 

> Some recommendations:

> 

>  -- Post the lavatory and any other area that may exceed 5 G with a

> pacemaker warning sign.  There is no standard sign that I'm aware of,

> but the NMR vendor may have one (or make one yourself).

> 

> -- In addition to the adjacent rooms, don't forget to survey above and

> below the NMR room.  Use a proper gaussmeter for static fields (not

> time-varying fields).  I have a FW Bell meter that works well.  If you

> don't have one, maybe you can borrow or rent one (GE Rents may have

> them, 1-800-GE RENTS)

> 

> --  Depending on the strength of the magnet, you can reach 600 G  at

> several feet from the magnet.  The largest hazard is from

> ferromagnetic tools and other items which can be sent flying toward

> the magnet.  Also, credit card magnetic strips and watches can be

> adversely affected by the high fields.  Also metallic eyeglasses

> frames.  We use inexpensive plastic chain-link fencing to demarcate

> the exclusion area where people can remove watches and wallets

> (hopefully you have trusty people!) if they need close access (repair,

> maintenance, sample placement, etc).

> 

> -  Computer monitors can be affected by as low as 5-10 G.  One

> solution is to use a flat-screen display instead of CRT (if you have

> the bucks!)

> 

> --  If you really would like to pursue shielding, you can use mu

> metal. It's quite expensive and also somewhat fragile.  Try Amuneal in

> Philadelphia, 800-755-9843, ask for Larry Maltin.

> 

> Hope that helps.  Let me know how you make out.

> 

> Joe Greco

> 

> _____________________________

> 

> Joseph M. Greco, CHP

> Radiation/Laser Safety Officer

> Eastman Kodak Company

> Rochester NY 14652-6261

> voice:  585-588-3324

> fax:       585-588-0825

> email:   joseph.greco@kodak.com

> motto:  "illegitimi non carborundum"

> 

> 

> 

>                       Russ Johnson                                  

>                       <rujohnso@nmsu.edu>            To:     

>                       "radsafe@list.Vanderbilt.Edu"                   

>                         Sent by:                      

>                       <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>                   

>                                  owner-radsafe@list.van         cc:   

>                                                      derbilt.edu      

>                                    Subject: Non Ionizing Rad Question 

>                                               

> 

> 

>                       11/01/2004 05:18 PM                             

>                            Please respond to Russ                     

>                                    Johnson                            

>                             

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> New question for the community, but a little outside the lines of

> ionizing rad. We recently had some researchers install an NMR in our

> chemistry dept. Protocols I've seen all say to establish a line of

> demarcation at 5 gauss, whereby only those operating or maintaining

> the equipment are allowed entry. However, someone supposedly took a

> meter into an adjacent lavoratory and read 30 gauss there when it was

> operating (staff apparently not from our dept). I don't know what it

> is in the lab when running, but it would certainly have to be much

> higher.

> 

> So, the questions are related to how to safely control that area when

> equipment is running. Putting notice signs on the lab doors to

> restrict access just doesn't cut it. Is there any kind of "affordable"

> cost-effective shielding that could be installed to break-up or

> significantly lower the magnetic field outside the lab? Any source for

> it? Related question, what is the standard being referred to for the 5

> gauss control point? Reply on or offline Thanks. -Russ Johnson

>  Rad Safety Specialist

> 

> **********************************************************************

> ** You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

> unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

> text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

> with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

> http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

> 

> 

> 

> 

> **********************************************************************

> ** You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

> unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

> text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

> with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

> http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

> 





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/