[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Humans Raise Risk of Europe Heatwaves:
At 08:52 PM 12/2/2004 -0500, farbersa wrote:
>Hi Don:
>
>Regarding your scepticism about my remark quoted in your post below, I
>have no doubt you were aware that there was substantial anti-smoking
>knowlege when you wrote your 8th grade paper in 1961. However, before you
>argue too strongly that my comment about physicians and other scientists
>continuing to claim smoking was safe long after much scientific
>information to the contrary was known, you should read the following
>excerpt from the source url cited below and the excerpt from the following
>report.
>
>======================
>"Tobacco and Health"
>Expert Witness Report Filed on behalf of Plaintiffs in:
>
>"The United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Philip Morris, Inc., et al.,
>Defendants," Civil Action No. 99-CV-02496 (GK) (Federal case)*
>
>By
>Robert N. Proctor
>
>http://www.psljournal.com/archives/papers/tobacco.cfm
>
>"It would be wrong to imagine, though, that knowledge of these hazards
>quickly became common knowledge. Few people read the technical medical
>literature, and even when people did read or hear about "the cancer
>scare," they also heard--repeatedly and from various sources--that smoking
>was safe. Cigarettes were widely advertised on billboards and in magazines
>and newspapers, and increasingly in movie theaters, on radio, and on
>television. Popular sports figures, movie stars, and other high-profile
>personalities appeared in thousands of cheery tobacco ads with never a
>mention of a hazard. Ronald Reagan and Joe Dimaggio advertised cigarettes
>in the 1940s, as did Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz in the 1950s. Perry Como,
>Jimmy Stewart, Frank Sinatra, and football and golf greats Frank Gifford
>and Arnold Palmer all appeared in tobacco ads--along with many other
>popular athletes, singers, media personalities. Popular pro-smoking books
>reported the testimony of physicians that tobacco was safe or that the
>hazards had been exaggerated.[26] Millions of Americans were led to
>believe that cigarettes were satisfying, sexy, and safe.
In the late 30s, both my parents smoked. They quite before I was born in
1951. I don't know the precise year, but a doctor told my dad if he wanted
to live (he's now 89) he'd better quit smoking. My mother gave it up to
support my Dad. She's long-dead of breast cancer, but nothing we could
point to could connect with smoking.
But, please, we knew it was satisfying and sexy, but I don't think anyone
in the 60s (that I knew at least) thought it was safe, just worth the risk
to be satisfied and sexy.
Weren't cigarette commercials banned from TV in 1971? Didn't the U.S.
Surgeon General issue a report as early as 1964?
non scholarly web page that hopefully had these dates correct:
http://www.tvacres.com/tobacco.htm
When my Dad found out I had smoked at a party, he told me to go into my
closet, inhale deeply and keep doing it. He made me go back and do it some
more until I practically heaved. He made his point. It wasn't cool.
Anyway, I can't believe people thought it was safe. Nice sugar coating,
etc., but I think anyone with a double-digit IQ wouldn't believe it was safe.
Cheers,
Richard
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/