[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: question concerning stress tests
Let me ask you this, if a technician or medical
technologist worked for you, what would you accept as
acceptable standards?
--- garyi@trinityphysics.com wrote:
> I agree that they should not give inaccurate
> information, and that doing so is 
> unprofessional.
> 
> For that reason, they should refer the patient to
> the physician.  The Dr.  won't know 
> either (95 times out of 100) for similar reasons -
> only a minuscule fraction of patients 
> could understand the answer and wouldn't ask to
> begin with.  The Dr's responsibility in 
> this regard is to ensure that X mCi of Y
> radiopharmacuetical administered to a patient is 
> "safe" or at least of such benefit as to outweigh
> any potiential harm.  After that its a 
> waste of time keep up with what dose is received,
> because if that answer is really 
> required an HP is just a phone call away.
> 
> We drive a car every day, Right?  What are we
> breathing on the road, specifically?  
> Chemical names and quantities, please!  While you're
> at it, please tell me the "dose" 
> from my round trip to work.
> 
> Not that I'll understand the answer. . . even though
> I drive every day.
> 
> -Gary Isenhower
> 
> On 12 Jan 2005 at 15:16, John Jacobus
> <crispy_bird@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> I usually do.  But they are given radiation safety
> training and should be more professional in what
> they
> tell patients.  Of course, the responsibilities
> belong
> with the licensee.
> 
> --- garyi@trinityphysics.com wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I want to put in a word for the nuclear medicine
> > technologists.  Its not their job to know 
> > the dose from typical procedures.  The physician
> or
> > the physicist is the person paid to 
> > know such things.
> > 
> > Even if the technologist could give such answers,
> > what would it mean to 99% of the 
> > patients?  So please cut these folks some slack.
> > 
> > -Gary Isenhower 
> >
>
**********************************************************************
> ** > You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe
> mailing > list. To >
> unsubscribe, send an e-mail to >
> Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put
> the > text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in
> the > body of the
> e-mail, > with no subject line. You can view the
> Radsafe > archives at
> > http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/ > > 
> 
> 
> =====
> +++++++++++++++++++
> "It doesn't matter whether you're riding an elephant
> or a donkey if
> you're going in the wrong direction." Jesse Jackson
> 
> 
> -- John
> John Jacobus, MS
> Certified Health Physicist
> e-mail:  crispy_bird@yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________ 
> Do you Yahoo!? 
> Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn
> more.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> 
=====
+++++++++++++++++++
"It doesn't matter whether you're riding an elephant or a donkey if you're going in the wrong direction."
Jesse Jackson
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail:  crispy_bird@yahoo.com
		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com 
 
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/