[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: question concerning stress tests
Let me ask you this, if a technician or medical
technologist worked for you, what would you accept as
acceptable standards?
--- garyi@trinityphysics.com wrote:
> I agree that they should not give inaccurate
> information, and that doing so is
> unprofessional.
>
> For that reason, they should refer the patient to
> the physician. The Dr. won't know
> either (95 times out of 100) for similar reasons -
> only a minuscule fraction of patients
> could understand the answer and wouldn't ask to
> begin with. The Dr's responsibility in
> this regard is to ensure that X mCi of Y
> radiopharmacuetical administered to a patient is
> "safe" or at least of such benefit as to outweigh
> any potiential harm. After that its a
> waste of time keep up with what dose is received,
> because if that answer is really
> required an HP is just a phone call away.
>
> We drive a car every day, Right? What are we
> breathing on the road, specifically?
> Chemical names and quantities, please! While you're
> at it, please tell me the "dose"
> from my round trip to work.
>
> Not that I'll understand the answer. . . even though
> I drive every day.
>
> -Gary Isenhower
>
> On 12 Jan 2005 at 15:16, John Jacobus
> <crispy_bird@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I usually do. But they are given radiation safety
> training and should be more professional in what
> they
> tell patients. Of course, the responsibilities
> belong
> with the licensee.
>
> --- garyi@trinityphysics.com wrote:
>
> >
> > I want to put in a word for the nuclear medicine
> > technologists. Its not their job to know
> > the dose from typical procedures. The physician
> or
> > the physicist is the person paid to
> > know such things.
> >
> > Even if the technologist could give such answers,
> > what would it mean to 99% of the
> > patients? So please cut these folks some slack.
> >
> > -Gary Isenhower
> >
>
**********************************************************************
> ** > You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe
> mailing > list. To >
> unsubscribe, send an e-mail to >
> Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put
> the > text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in
> the > body of the
> e-mail, > with no subject line. You can view the
> Radsafe > archives at
> > http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/ > >
>
>
> =====
> +++++++++++++++++++
> "It doesn't matter whether you're riding an elephant
> or a donkey if
> you're going in the wrong direction." Jesse Jackson
>
>
> -- John
> John Jacobus, MS
> Certified Health Physicist
> e-mail: crispy_bird@yahoo.com
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn
> more.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
>
=====
+++++++++++++++++++
"It doesn't matter whether you're riding an elephant or a donkey if you're going in the wrong direction."
Jesse Jackson
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird@yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/